The Didi platform shall review the specific information of drivers and passengers in accordance with laws and regulations. If disputes arise due to lax information review, Didi shall bear corresponding responsibilities according to the degree of its fault.
Article 424 of my country's Contract Law stipulates: "An intermediary contract is a contract in which the intermediary reports to the client the opportunity to conclude a contract or provides intermediary services for the conclusion of the contract, and the client pays remuneration." It can be seen that as an intermediary, Didi Platform’s obligation is to provide media services for the principal to conclude a contract.
Then, performing strict information review obligations, providing authentic, accurate, qualified and legal vehicles and driving services to both entrusting parties, and carrying out necessary safety management and guarantee work are the specific legal obligations of the Didi platform content. If the Didi platform conceals important facts about entering into a contract, or provides false information that harms the interests of users, it will need to bear corresponding legal liability.
Expand information
The obligation to review information is the basic obligation of the platform. As a platform that provides travel intermediary services, providing true, accurate, reasonable and legal information is the intermediary's primary obligation, and it is also an important prerequisite for ensuring the vitality of the platform. The legal relationship between passengers and drivers at both ends of the platform is entirely based on travel information. The Didi platform should review the specific information of drivers and passengers in accordance with laws and regulations.
To what extent the Didi platform has fulfilled its obligations in the case of the murder of the flight attendant, due to the current limited understanding of the specific facts, it is not yet possible to draw a conclusion on the legal liability of the Didi platform, but its legal liability is by no means The exemption clause in the standard contract can be excluded.
The suspect Liu had a record of verbal sexual harassment complaints before the incident. Customer service contacted the suspect five times by phone. Due to unreasonable judgment rules and a weak sense of responsibility, the subsequent complaints were not properly handled. These specific details can be used as an important basis for judging that Didi has not fulfilled its obligation to strictly review information.
People's Daily Online-Stewardess was killed? Should Didi take responsibility?