(1) Compared with court proceedings, administrative mediation does not need complicated procedures, and it is immediate and efficient regardless of whether an agreement is reached. (2) Compared with court litigation, administrative mediation, as the embodiment of government service function, the overall cost of the parties is far lower than the relatively high litigation cost and high lawyer's agency fee of the court. Considering the costs and benefits, the parties naturally prefer to choose low-cost administrative mediation to solve disputes.
(3) Administrative mediation respects the autonomy of the parties and takes the participation of the parties as a necessary condition, which will not only help the parties understand the law, but also help reduce the cost of law enforcement in the future.
At the same time, the contents, methods and results of administrative mediation should be based on legality. And the law-as Marx said-even the king can't give orders to economic laws-is the embodiment and guarantee of a harmonious society in the ultimate sense. Therefore, the process of administrative mediation, as a process of law implementation, is also a harmonious process implied and pursued by the law itself. Secondly, administrative mediation is conducive to the realization of harmony between administrative organs and private parties.
(1) Administrative mediation is produced on the basis of democratic consultation and the willingness of the parties, which embodies the organic combination of democratic management and the voluntary principle of the parties exercising the right of disposition independently, and can also play the same role as compulsory administrative acts.
(2) Through patient, meticulous, comprehensive and concrete mediation, we can cultivate the work style of the staff of the administrative organs, establish a good working image of the administrative organs, and carry forward the spirit of serving the people, thus enhancing the people's trust in the administrative organs, improving the law enforcement authority of the administrative organs, and further establishing a close, harmonious, coordinated and mutual trust relationship between the people and the government.
(3) Administrative mediation bases the expression of the independent will of the parties on the authority obedience and trust established by the correct law enforcement of the administrative organs, so that the parties can voluntarily listen to the correct and beneficial persuasion of the administrative organs, resolve disputes and resolve contradictions. In this way, it is different from the passive administrative act of maintaining order according to law, because it not only solves the problem of minimum requirements for rectification, but also further enables the government to take a proactive approach at a higher level, creating a more reasonable and perfect social relationship permitted by law, recognized and agreed by the parties and the government, and urges the administrative organs to perform their duties in a more comprehensive and thorough sense.
At the same time, the process of administrative mediation is also the process of mutual supervision between the administrative organ and the relative person on whether to mediate voluntarily or according to law. As mentioned above, the law itself also contains and pursues social harmony. Therefore, the supervision of the administrative counterpart also urges the administrative organs to administer according to law and realize the harmonious value and pursuit of law. Finally, the existence of administrative mediation system ensures the harmony of social conflict resolution mechanism system. The intensity of social conflicts is different, which determines that its resolution mechanism must be divided into different levels of systems. Article 9 stipulates that the object of administrative mediation by public security organs is "fighting or damaging other people's property caused by civil disputes, which violates public security management and has minor circumstances". Therefore, bringing social contradictions with relatively slight intensity into the scope of administrative mediation and other fierce social contradictions into the scope of administrative detention and even criminal sanctions can not only save the administrative law enforcement resources of public security organs, but also ensure the resolution of social contradictions and realize the internal coordination of social contradiction resolution mechanisms.