Question: I used to be a worker in a machinery factory in Pinggu District, and now I am retired at home. In 2006, I was sued by Li for a traffic accident, and Li demanded that I pay more than 300,000 yuan in compensation for economic losses. I was not convinced of the liability for this traffic accident, but both the first and second instance courts supported Li’s request. After the judgment came into effect, the court took coercive measures against me and sealed my pension account. I am very complaining about this because I am not satisfied with the verdict and am applying for a retrial. The court will have to wait until the retrial proceedings are completed before deciding whether to implement it. I am old and sick now. The pension issued by the state is protected by law and is my only source of income. The court cannot enforce it. Is it illegal for the court to take coercive measures to seize my pension account while the case is under review?
Answer: Scout Legal Online Consulting will answer your questions.
If the parties are dissatisfied with the legally effective first-instance judgment or ruling of the court or believe that the first-instance judgment is erroneous, they may apply to the higher-level people's court for a retrial based on the judgment; if one party has more people or both parties have If the case is a citizen's case, you can also apply to the original People's Court for a retrial. If a party applies for retrial, the execution of the judgment or ruling will not be suspended.