If 1 disagrees with the appraisal result, it can apply for re-appraisal or conduct strong cross-examination during the court session. 2. Whether it constitutes a crime requires a comprehensive analysis and defense of the evidence of the whole case-the lawyer can't determine whether it is an innocent defense or a guilty defense, nor can he make a judgment prediction-the good case result is made, not predicted out of thin air. For the details of the specific acts proved in the evidence materials, the investigation organs and procuratorial organs will interpret the legal attributes from the perspective of accusations, while the defense lawyers will interpret the legal attributes from the perspective of defense. Which interpretation method the court finally adopts depends on which interpretation is more reasonable. 3. Limitations of consultation: consultation only solves the problem of finding a lawyer. Through consultation, you can find a lawyer you think is suitable; Consultation can't solve the problem of the case itself, because you can understand that without the rights of lawyers and the practical experience of knowledge and skills accumulated by lawyers through many cases, practical problems can't be solved. Moreover, lawyers gradually carry out specific criminal defense work around the evidence of the whole case, which is a complex and concrete process-thousands of cases become thousands of ways of playing, and you can't fully understand it. At the first time, I entrusted a criminal defense lawyer specializing in criminal defense business. Criminal defense is a process, a step-by-step process of specific work with the examination, judgment and application of criminal evidence as the core. Lawyers are professionals, and like doctors, they specialize in civil and criminal defense. Therefore, it is necessary to entrust a criminal defense lawyer who specializes in criminal defense business.
Legal objectivity:
Article 76 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) * * * A party may apply to the people's court for an appraisal on the specialized issue of finding out the facts. If the parties apply for appraisal, the qualified appraisers shall be determined by both parties through consultation; If negotiation fails, it shall be designated by the people's court. If the parties concerned do not apply for identification, and the people's court considers it necessary to identify specialized issues, it shall entrust a qualified appraiser for identification. Article 77 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) * * * An appraiser has the right to know the case materials needed for the appraisal, and may ask the parties and witnesses when necessary. The appraiser shall put forward written appraisal opinions and sign or seal the appraisal book. Article 78 of the Civil Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), if the parties have objections to the expert opinions or the people's court considers it necessary for the expert to appear in court, the expert shall testify in court. If the appraiser refuses to testify in court after being notified by the people's court, the appraisal opinion shall not be used as the basis for ascertaining the facts; The party who paid the appraisal fee may request the return of the appraisal fee.