Someone 1999 is suspected of defrauding 50,000 yuan (others are at large) and has been released on bail pending trial. Now he has been arrested again. I wonder if it is legal for the public security o

Someone 1999 is suspected of defrauding 50,000 yuan (others are at large) and has been released on bail pending trial. Now he has been arrested again. I wonder if it is legal for the public security organs to do so? Bail pending trial does not mean closing the case, let alone acquitting.

Bail pending trial is one of the compulsory measures in criminal proceedings, and the term is 12 months. 12 months later, when your bail pending trial is over, the public security organ shall refund the deposit. Since then, the public security organs have not taken any coercive measures against you, and your freedom is no longer bound. But this is only a discussion about the compulsory measures you take, and it does not affect the criminal investigation of the public security organs. Theoretically, public security organs will not and should not stop investigating cases, and this investigation process is continuous. Once there is a breakthrough in the investigation process, the public security organs will collect enough evidence, and the judicial organs will re-implement compulsory measures against you. In this case, there is no time limit for the investigation. As long as there is enough evidence after the investigation, you can be re-enforced. In this case, in the years from 1999 to now, there is actually no violation of the law.

/kloc-During 0/2 months of bail pending trial, you can engage in normal social activities and exercise normal civil rights, such as getting married, giving birth, working, getting a driver's license, getting a bank card, etc. However, according to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, you may not engage in the following activities:

(a) without the approval of the executive organ, shall not leave the city or county where they live;

(2) Being present in time when being arraigned;

(three) shall not interfere with the testimony of witnesses in any form;

(four) shall not destroy or forge evidence or collusion.

In addition, in practice, it is common for public security organs not to refund the deposit within the time limit.

Therefore, in this case, this practice of the public security organs should be legal.