According to the Regulations on the Punishment of Civil Servants of Administrative Organs
Article 17 If a civil servant of an administrative organ violates the law and discipline and has been punished, dismissed, dismissed from public office or resigned from leadership positions before the administrative organ makes a decision on punishment, the administrative organ shall punish him according to the facts of his violation of the law and discipline. If a civil servant of an administrative organ is sentenced to punishment according to law, he shall be dismissed.
Article 9 If a civil servant of an administrative organ is dismissed, his/her personnel relationship with his/her unit will be terminated and he/she will no longer serve as a civil servant from the date when the punishment decision takes effect. If the civil servants of administrative organs show repentance during the disciplinary period except dismissal, and there is no violation of law and discipline again, the punishment will be lifted after the expiration of the disciplinary period.
Extended data
Cases of drunk driving and dismissal from public office:
On July 4th, 20 17, the People's Court of Yongding County, Longyan City, Fujian Province disclosed that it had concluded a case of dangerous driving with a special subject. Lin, an employee of an enterprise and institution, was sentenced to two months' criminal detention, suspended for three months and fined RMB 4,000. Lin was sentenced for a crime and was also expelled from public office.
It is understood that after graduating from college, Lin successfully entered a certain enterprise and institution through the examination. Because of his outstanding ability, he was valued by the leaders and was regarded as a candidate for promotion and appointment. Unexpectedly, all this was broken by a traffic accident on July 26, 20 16.
On the same day, Lin was preparing to go home with a motorcycle without a license plate after drinking, and on the way, he collided with a motorcycle driven by Lan, who was driving in the opposite direction, causing damage to both cars and injuries to Lin and Lan. It is determined that Lin and Lan are equally responsible for the accident. Afterwards, the police conducted an alcohol test on Lin and conducted a blood test, and entrusted an appraisal agency to identify him. After identification, Lin's blood alcohol content is176.95438+0 mg/100 ml, which belongs to drunk driving.
During the trial, Lin said that he realized the illegality of his behavior and regretted it. However, his defender believes that Lin's plot is extremely minor and does little harm. Based on the principle of combining education with punishment, he should be exempted from criminal punishment.
After trial, the court held that the defendant Lin violated traffic regulations and drunk and drove a motor vehicle in driving without a license on the road, which constituted a crime of dangerous driving. Lin is not qualified to drive a motor vehicle and should be given a heavier punishment according to law. After arriving at the case, he can truthfully confess the facts of the crime and plead guilty voluntarily in court. He has a good attitude of pleading guilty and can be given a lighter punishment according to law. Accordingly, the above judgment was made.
Xiamen Net-Longyan, Fujian: A public official was sentenced to two months in prison for drunk driving and was expelled from his unit.