I have answered this question above.
3. Monthly payment can be implemented. As for providing a guarantor, it depends on your agreement. You can't help it if he doesn't provide a guarantor for the lawsuit.
What you say depends on the concrete facts. If he sells the house for more than the amount he has paid you, then he is suspected of transferring the property. It also depends on the fact that most of the houses are shared by husband and wife, so we can only calculate that his share cannot be greater than the amount paid to you. If you ask the court to find it normal, you can't get it back. You can't take back the house unless the seller knows that he is willing to buy it in order to transfer the ownership.
5. For Party A, it means getting the letter of understanding. The punishment of drunk driving is generally a substantive punishment, and it is generally not suspended. Even if a letter of understanding is issued, it can only play a little role. It should be said that the effect will not be obvious.
As I answered in the fifth point, the opposing lawyer is too confident, so it should be difficult for the driver to get a suspended sentence. Compensation in place can reduce the sentence, but it is difficult to get a suspended sentence without going to jail. So now you'd better get as much compensation as possible and collect more proof of the other party's property, so that the court will not have rare problems in executing the judgment.
7. From the legal point of view, if Party A and Party B suffer damage due to the same act, they should be jointly and severally liable for compensation, and they can claim compensation from either party, and they must pay in full. As for the overpayment according to their responsibilities, they can claim compensation from the other party. But in practice, such implementation is very difficult and difficult to succeed.