How to treat the Li Zhuang case?

Li Zhuang, former lawyer and partner of Beijing Kangda Law Firm. On June 5438+065438+ 10, 2009, Li Zhuang accepted the entrustment and became the defender of Gong Gangmo, the main suspect in the triad-related case in Gong Gangmo, Chongqing. On February 65438+ of that year, Gong Gangmo reported Li Zhuang to the Chongqing judicial authorities, claiming that he was instigated by Li Zhuang to fabricate a false confession of "extorting a confession by torture". Subsequently, Chongqing police arrested Li Zhuang on suspicion of perjury.

20 10 65438+ 10 On 8 October, Chongqing Jiangbei District Court found Li Zhuang guilty of forging evidence and obstructing testimony, and sentenced him to two and a half years' imprisonment. On February 4th of the same year, Li Zhuang wrote a confession in the form of a Tibetan poem, which was recognized by the court as "a good attitude of pleading guilty". On February 9th, 20 10, Chongqing No.1 Intermediate People's Court sentenced Li Zhuang to one and a half years' imprisonment.

20 1 1 On March 29th, 2008, just as Li Zhuang was about to be released from prison, he was put on file for investigation for "crime of omission", but the case ended in the prosecution's withdrawal. 20 1 1 June, Li Zhuang was released from prison.

Extended data:

Three positive meanings of "Li Zhuang case" to the rule of law;

The first is to promote China lawyers to hold a group, which is very important for lawyers to protect their rights.

Secondly, after the final judgment of Li Zhuang case in the first quarter, it directly promoted the promulgation of "Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence in Handling Criminal Cases" in May 20 10, which is a small progress in judicial reform.

Third, the overhaul of the Criminal Procedure Law has been accelerated, including the most important "Li Zhuang clause", that is, if a case similar to Li Zhuang is encountered again, it should be investigated and tried in a different place; In addition, the case (Gong Gangmo case) should be tried first, and the derivative case (Li Zhuang case) should be retried. It is the inversion of judicial logic that Li Zhuang case cannot be judged first, and then Gong Gangmo can be retried. This is a big step forward.

China The truth of com- Li Zhuang case came out: unwilling to cooperate with Chongqing in cracking down on evil.

Xinhuanet-After Li Zhuang was released from prison, he went to Chongqing four times to seek the assistance of public security personnel in obtaining evidence.