Is it not self-defense to be deliberately beaten back but sue "you hit me, I will fight back"?

Self-defense will only be considered under certain circumstances. Just because you hit me and I hit you back doesn't mean you're purely in self-defense. In short, it is best not to fight with people, and the result will not be so good.

If you can't fight back after being beaten, fighting back is a fight. However, if you don't fight back and get beaten, you have to do injury identification to investigate the criminal responsibility of the hitter. If there is no harm, it is only administrative detention at most. The money for going to the hospital can be compensated by the hitter, and all the person who is beaten can get is an apology. If you don't answer back, the police station later decided to pay the minimum compensation to the victim 1000 yuan. This is because the victim does not go to the hospital, and can ask for up to 5,000 yuan without harm. If you need to go to the hospital, you can ask for all the expenses separately. In this way, many people may prefer not to scold or fight back, and there will be fewer fights.

In life, if you are beaten, you should immediately call the police or run away to avoid being beaten on the premise of ensuring personal safety. But if you hit the other side back, it will cause the situation to expand, so both sides should bear the corresponding responsibilities. The essence of self-defense is to stop illegal infringement and protect one's legitimate rights and interests. When others hit you first, you fight back, which is usually considered as fighting with each other. Both sides are actively pursuing the result of the illegal damage of the other side, so there is no intention of justifiable defense at all and it cannot constitute justifiable defense.

There is no deep hatred between people. Maybe the two sides can sit down and talk it over and solve the problem perfectly. Please think twice before you act!