1. After reading your last addition, I feel like you are leaving. I am helpless and speechless. The law is so fragile!
2. If you are still online, can you contact me? I want to ask you something.
Supplementary answer:
1. If the owner of such a tall building does not adopt the closing issue in the end, I will be sorry to the netizens, haha.
2. Whether they want to steal or set fire: They are both suspected of crimes and have already started to commit crimes, but they have failed. If there are other families around your warehouse and they set fire, the crime may be more serious and they should be held criminally responsible for arson. However, if there is no physical evidence or other evidence to prove that they set the fire, it will generally not be considered a crime of arson.
3. About your dog:
(1) You are raising a large dog without a license: it is indeed illegal, but you should only be subject to public security penalties.
(2) The dog is still yours, and you should be punished by public security, but it does not mean that the other party has the right to take your dog away and sell it: If you have evidence to prove that the dog was indeed taken away and sold by the other party Yes, you can claim compensation for the loss later or use the money from the sale of the dog to offset the loss.
1. "He said there was no conclusive evidence of stealing, but he did not take out the items from the warehouse. So if you open the door of the warehouse in the middle of the night, can you tell that you just stole something?":
(1) This is no longer a matter of preparation for theft, but a theft has already begun: the other party has prepared the stolen vehicle, gathered manpower, actually entered your yard, and opened your door. 's warehouse. This is already an obvious act of theft, but it is an attempted theft rather than a preparation for theft (preparation for a crime is a tool for preparing a crime, investigating the path of a crime, etc.). According to the provisions of our country's criminal law, preparatory and attempted thefts need to be investigated. However, the attempted offender may be given a lighter or reduced punishment, but the lighter or reduced punishment for his criminal behavior cannot be based on the premise that he does not admit that he is committing theft and does not deny that he is at fault.
(2) I suggest you: collect the evidence you mentioned and don’t get angry here, including: First, “The thief didn’t know there were so many dogs inside. He didn’t expect to bite him to death. That’s The living person said. In fact, there were more than two of them, and there was a driver outside the wall who ran away after hearing their screams. The testimony of these two people can be that you or others talked to them about this. It can be a secret recording of the incident, or it can be a written testimony that they agreed to write to you (it doesn't seem easy), or it can be when they themselves said this to others, and others can testify for you.
The second is evidence that they entered your yard and opened the door of your warehouse: If you called the police at that time, it is best to have a police record for this part; if not, you can find someone to give it to you testify. If only your workers testify for you, the proof will be weak.
(3) Entering someone else’s yard in the middle of the night and opening someone else’s warehouse: It can be proven to be theft, but do you have evidence to prove the facts you mentioned? Without evidence, nothing can be said.
(4) Suggestion: After collecting relevant evidence, report the case to the local public security bureau. If it is not accepted, you can report it to the procuratorate.
2. "What is the basis for his request for 600,000 yuan in compensation? Does the state have relevant documents? You can't just ask them.":
(1) Why does he ask you to pay compensation? 600,000? Only he knows. It doesn't matter if he opens his mouth or not, as long as he understands.
(2) According to the law, the compensation you should bear includes: the medical expenses and transportation expenses of the deceased (you did not have this expense when he was sent to the hospital), death compensation (according to the last year in your area) Annual per capita disposable income of urban residents or per capita net income of rural residents, calculated based on 20 years). However, for each additional year for those over 60 years old, the age will be reduced by one year; for those over 75 years old, calculated based on five years), the living expenses of the dependent (per capita consumption expenditure of urban residents and per capita annual living consumption expenditure of rural residents in the previous year). If the dependent is a minor, the period shall be calculated as if he or she is eighteen years old; if the dependent is incapable of working and has no other source of living, the period shall be calculated as 20 years.
However, if you are over 60 years old, your age will be reduced by one year for every additional year; if you are over 75 years old, your age will be calculated as five years.
A caregiver refers to a minor who is legally obligated to support him or an adult close relative who has lost the ability to work and has no other source of livelihood. If the dependent has other dependents, the person obligated to compensate shall only compensate the victim for the part that he should bear according to law. If there are several dependents, the total annual compensation shall not exceed the per capita consumption expenditure of urban residents or the per capita annual living consumption expenditure of rural residents in the previous year. )etc.
For details, please refer to Articles 19, 28, and 29 of the "Interpretations of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases".
(3) For the above compensation, because the deceased was at fault (theft), your liability for compensation should be reduced.
3. "He said he would put me in jail. In fact, I am not afraid of going to jail at all. I just want to know, given my situation, even if from ruin is established and even if it is illegal to keep a dog, how many years will the sentence be? ":
(1) You cause death due to negligence, and the maximum sentence is 7 years. But the other party was bitten to death by a dog because of theft and should be given a lighter punishment.
Attachment: Article 233 of the Criminal Law: Whoever negligently causes death shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years; if the circumstances are relatively minor, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years. If this law provides otherwise, such provisions shall prevail.
(2) You are not committing suicide: you rushed to the countryside immediately after receiving the news and sent people to the hospital. There is no act of self-comfort. Your workers and hospital doctors can attest to this.
4. Don’t be impulsive, impulsiveness will make things worse. I suggest you expose it to the media or report it to the next higher level of police.