As far as the legal effect is concerned, the importance of the articles of association is compared to the "articles of association", that is to say, if there are provisions in the articles of association but not in the company law or not, the articles of association shall prevail, and as long as they are not illegal, they have the highest effect. So I think this "regular meeting" refers to the articles of association of the company.
The controversy over the "profit distribution plan" you introduced is completely different from the opinion on whether to hold a board meeting. It is a shareholder's rights dispute. A general meeting of shareholders can be convened in advance to make a resolution according to the voting rights requirements. If there are still shareholders who object, they can file a lawsuit, and the court will decide whether the procedure is legal and whether the distribution plan and other substantive issues are legal. As far as profit distribution is concerned, if there are provisions in the articles of association, it shall be distributed in accordance with the provisions of the articles of association. If not, it should be distributed according to the proportion of capital contribution.