The defender refused to defend.

There are two kinds of refusal to defend in criminal proceedings: one is that the suspect and the defendant refuse the defender to defend them. The legal basis is the provisions of Article 39 of the Criminal Procedure Law: during the trial, the defendant may refuse the defender to continue to defend him, or entrust another defender to defend him. The main body of the right of defense is the criminal suspect and the defendant. The right of defense is basically the litigation right of criminal suspects and defendants, and the right of defense of defenders comes from the subject of the right of defense. Therefore, the criminal procedure law has no reason to restrict the right of criminal suspects and defendants to refuse to defend. Once put forward, it should take effect.

According to the Supreme People's Court's judicial interpretation, if the defendant insists on exercising the right of defense and refuses the defender appointed by the people's court to defend him, the people's court shall allow it and file a case. If the defendant is blind, deaf, mute or with limited capacity, a minor under the age of 65 at the time of trial, and a person who may be sentenced to death, the people's court shall allow it, but if the defendant needs to entrust another defender, the people's court shall appoint another defender for him.

Another kind of refusal to defend in criminal proceedings means that lawyers refuse to continue to defend criminal suspects and defendants. Article 29 of the Lawyers Law stipulates that if the entrusted matter is illegal, the client uses the services provided by the lawyer to engage in illegal activities or the client conceals the facts, the lawyer has the right to refuse to defend. According to the relevant provisions of the Lawyers Law, after accepting the entrustment, a defense lawyer shall not refuse to defend without justifiable reasons. Therefore, there are strict legal conditions for lawyers to refuse to defend, and only those who meet the above conditions can refuse to defend. This is different from the right to refuse defense of criminal suspects and defendants.