What are the drug cases?
Defendant Li Shide, male, aged 44, was a worker of Qiezixi Meat Joint Factory in Jiulongpo, Chongqing before his arrest. Defendant Zhang Shuming, male, 38 years old, unemployed. 1September 9, 980 was sentenced to three years of reeducation through labor for theft and fraud; 1 September 23, 1983 and 199 1 August 24, 1993 were sentenced to 9 years' imprisonment and1year respectively, and released on August 23, 1993. The Public Security Bureau of shizong county, Qujing, Yunnan Province filed a case for investigation on drug trafficking cases of Li Shide and Zhang Shuming. After the investigation, it will be transferred to the procuratorate for review and prosecution. On June 1998, 1 1, the branch of Qujing District Procuratorate filed a public prosecution with Qujing District Intermediate People's Court. The indictment found the criminal facts of the above-mentioned defendant as follows:1In July 1993, the defendant asked Li Shide to go to Simao to buy drugs, and agreed to pay the travel expenses and drug money. Li was responsible for contacting and purchasing. After arriving in Yunnan, he went back to Chongqing because he didn't buy drugs for the time being, and Li stayed in Simao to help him buy heroin. After contact with drugs in August, Li called Simao to remit money. Zhang Shuming first asked his concubine Xue Ping to go to Li Shide with 29,000 yuan of drug money. The two handed the money to Bielinfei (handled separately) to buy drugs, and then Zhang Shuming also rushed to Simao. Because of the contradiction with Li Shide, he returned to Chongqing first. 1993 10 10 On October 6, the defendant Li Shide was arrested by the police at Kunming Railway Station when he returned to Kunming with 199.5 grams of heroin. On October 9th, 65438/KLOC-0, Li Shide led the police to arrest Zhang Shuming. 1August 1997 13 was tried by the Intermediate People's Court of Qujing District, Yunnan Province, and Li Shide was sentenced to death, suspended for two years and deprived of political rights for life; Zhang Shuming was sentenced to five years in prison for drug trafficking. After the verdict was pronounced in the first instance, the two defendants did not appeal. The branch of Qujing District Procuratorate believes that the first-instance judgment wrongly identified the defendant Li Shide and improperly applied the law, and severely punished the defendant Zhang Shuming. 1997 10 lodged a protest with the Higher People's Court of Yunnan Province on123. Yunnan Provincial People's Procuratorate supports the protest opinions of Qujing District Procuratorate Branch. Reason for protest: 1. Qualitative error. In this case, the defendant Zhang Shuming invited Li Shide to Simao to buy drugs for him. Zhang Qi is the first offender, and the drug money and travel expenses are paid by Zhang Shuming. Li committed the crime of buying and transporting drugs before and after Zhang's crime, and the two defendants had the same criminal intention in the whole criminal process. Therefore, the defendant Zhang Shuming should also be convicted of drug trafficking. There is no basis for the judgment that Zhang's behavior constitutes a crime of drug trafficking Second, the sentence is extremely light. Defendant Zhang Shuming is a recidivist who has been sentenced for many times. According to Article 65 of the Criminal Law, he should be given a heavier punishment. Zhang Shuming's position and role in the crime with Li Shide are significant and should be severely punished. The first trial only sentenced him to five years in prison, which is obviously a very light sentence. The Higher People's Court of Yunnan Province held that the facts of the original judgment were clear and the evidence was true and sufficient. The actions of the defendants Li Shide and Zhang Shuming have constituted the crime of drug trafficking. After the defendant Li Shide was arrested, he actively assisted the public security organs in arresting his accomplices. Those who have rendered meritorious service may be given a lighter punishment according to law. Defendant Zhang Shuming committed a new crime within three years after he was released from prison. He is a recidivist and should be severely punished according to law. The reasons for the protest of the procuratorial organs are partially established and should be adopted. According to the position, function and specific circumstances of the two defendants in this case, the final judgment was made on June 1998 and 12 in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 189 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), Article 12 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) and Article 1 and Article 14 of the Decision of the NPC Standing Committee on Drug Control:/kloc- Criminal judgment's conviction of the defendant Li Shide and the sentencing of the defendant Zhang Shuming were revoked by Qujing Intermediate People's Court (1997). 2. Defendant Li Shide was convicted of drug trafficking, sentenced to death, suspended for two years and deprived of political rights for life; And confiscate the property of RMB 1 10,000 yuan. 3. Defendant Zhang Shuming was convicted of drug trafficking, sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life; And confiscated property of RMB20,000.