1 After watching the trial, in order to finish my homework, I read Kafka's The Trial first. At that time, I only felt that its language was too simple or even plain, and many details were in a trance, because I had to keep looking back to understand what the author really wanted to express. In addition to the linguistic features, the biggest feeling: doubt and absurdity. From the initial arrest of the protagonist to the trial, we never know what crime he has committed and whether he has been framed. The court in the book is like a shadow over our heads, and the trial process is pale and powerless. However, it is this seemingly absurd interpretation that makes us think: does such a thing really exist? It is through this kind of events that the author reflects and criticizes the irrationality in the real world, and uses exaggeration and symbol and strong contrast to stimulate intuitive feelings. The more unreasonable the various phenomena in the trial are, the more it proves the unreasonable connotation and essence contained in the real society. They are both opposite and connected.
Although the author wrote this novel alluding to the inside story of the judicial system of Austria-Hungary at that time, satirizing the absurdity of the law and exposing the corruption of capitalist bureaucrats, it also has a great warning effect on our judicial system today. We can also see the importance of correct procedures. Without procedures, all judicial activities will inevitably appear a bit chaotic.
Procedural justice ensures the fairness and rationality of the trial procedure, ensures that the litigation rights of the defendant and others are safeguarded, and enables the referee to know the truth of the case from different or even opposite angles, thus achieving fair conviction and sentencing. Ensuring the justice of criminal trial procedure can punish crimes accurately and timely and maintain good social order. Whether a fair trial procedure contributes to the formation of a fair judgment or not, it has an independent significance: the people directly affected by the judgment, together with the judicial officials who represent the state in prosecuting and judging, have equal status as the subject of litigation, can debate, persuade and negotiate rationally on an equal footing, and play an active role in the judgment, instead of passively waiting for the official to judge their own destiny and passively obeying the state power organs to dispose of their own rights and interests, so that they can be recognized as human dignity.
After reading "Trial" 2, it is such a world. How can it be written like this?
I read Kafka's novels for the first time, but before that, I heard the story of the castle from a Taoist priest, which was ridiculous. Some favorite writers will be called "Kafka" of xx. Such a curious seed took me, bought this book by accident and opened it at will.
To tell the truth, the first half of the book was read in one go, but the later experience became more and more difficult to understand, and I was so anxious that I couldn't read a word. Just when I was calm, I spent several nights watching it, but I didn't dare to say that I understood it.
This is a very simple story, but surprisingly, the whole story is true or false, absurd and ironic, but the dialogue between the characters is thought-provoking.
Profound scene: K was inexplicably arrested and made a big scene in the first instance of the court. The trial court is actually a rented place, and the court is a shabby attic. K and his uncle went to see a lawyer. As a result, they fell in love with the maid. They don't want to see lawyers humiliate others and turn to painters for help. As a result, his family was in a panic and finally bought a painting. The painter gave three choices. K was embarrassed by the Russians, talked to the godfather in the church, and was finally executed in secret.
When I closed the book, these scenes still came to my eyes, and I could feel that the laws in the K era were extremely absurd, complicated and disorderly. It can be seen that the more K runs around, the more he knows, and the more he finds himself powerless. This invisible hand seems to be able to judge at will for no reason. I don't know what crime I committed until I die, and I don't expect others to know.
I am surprised that Kafka's writing technique is eclectic, with no explanation throughout, no background of the times and no emphasis on the coherence of chapters. Sometimes the plot comes to an abrupt end and there is no dialogue between the supporting actors. After the chapter appeared once, it never appeared again. It is only inextricably linked with K and the court, and the whole process is promoted in the state of K, but it seems logical from the reader's point of view, as if watching a detective mystery drama and thinking about what crime K has committed.
After watching the ending, I can only describe it as amazing. Kafka can be regarded as the representative of the word absurdity.
Reflections on The Trial 3 The Tokyo Trial tells the story of a difficult trial of 28 Japanese war criminals by the Far East International Military Tribunal, an ally of Tokyo, which took place in 1946.
In the movie, what makes me gnash my teeth most is the Japanese idiot who lost his brother and lost his mind, and the defense lawyer of the Japanese delegation who knows right from wrong.
When the Japanese army commander, son Sun and a thief from China were witnesses of Japan's invasion of the mainland, the Japanese defense lawyer who wore black-rimmed glasses and looked like a mouse still stated his views unreasonably and confidently, and loudly questioned the first witness: "Are you Japanese?" Loudly, the whole court echoed with his voice, as if the Japanese commander had betrayed Japan, even if it was to reverse right and wrong and get sick? At that moment, I really wanted to refute the Japanese who bravely stood on the witness stand and told the truth. I think: Although the Japanese commander invaded China, which brought harm to China, but now he is standing in court, he has been completely exonerated, and people will forgive him.
I still remember what a Japanese lawyer said, and I am more sure that he is a good idea. "We are helping Manchukuo achieve peaceful reunification. On the contrary, the people of China should be grateful to us. The Japanese government has done nothing wrong! " He spoke as if China had really wronged them.
But after all, there is truth in the world. In the end, Japanese imperialism was punished by law, and several leaders were killed to show justice.
The "Tokyo trial" deeply touched me, and I deeply understood the insult suffered by my motherland. I learned the value of peace from it, and the Japanese also learned a lesson! After all, it is oneself who is finally destroyed by desire!
Reflections on "Trial" 4 The Tokyo Trial focused on the trial of Japanese war criminals in World War II, and described the trial process of 28 Class A war criminals by judges from China, the United States, Britain, France and other countries after World War II. At the end of the film, judges in different countries have great differences in sentencing. Judge Mei Ruzhen of China denounced Japanese war criminals' wanton plunder of China's resources and heinous crimes against humanity from a legal perspective. When voting whether to execute the death penalty, he finally hanged seven Class-A war criminals, including tojo hideki and Kenji Toshihara, with a vote of 6 to 5.
There is such a scene that is particularly shocking: in a pub, when the beautiful proprietress gently hummed Japanese folk songs, danced lightly with her post-war vision, her love for life and her natural kindness, a bullet from nowhere passed through her body, and she just fell down, and her bright smile faded before it could bloom. The flowers of spring drifted with the wind in the darkness brought by the war, and she just fell down and was everywhere. These are all true and objective. The war not only hurt the people of China, but also caused great harm to their own people. So this trial is even more important. Not only do China people want to get back their blood debts from those sinners, but they should also give an account to their own people. In this trial, we should not only punish war criminals, but also sound the alarm, stay away from war and cherish peace.
The "Tokyo trial" seems to have given us a glass of hard liquor, ignited our patriotic heart, and also seemed to have given us a sober agent, prompting us to keep a clear head on the fascist ghost forever. I think anyone who has seen this film has a more intuitive and clear understanding of the criminal acts of Japanese militarism, and can better understand that today's work is hard-won. This has a profound educational effect, especially for teenagers who have not experienced this history.
To forget the memory, to those who passed away, to those who fought for the rise of China, to that solemn history, and to those great people of China.