1. Insufficient legal provisions: the legal provisions of false litigation crime are relatively backward, and there is no clear stipulation on the constitutive requirements, criminal forms and legal responsibilities of false litigation crime, which leads to constant disputes in judicial practice.
2. Problems in judicial practice: false litigation crimes are difficult to identify, collect evidence and attack in judicial practice. It is necessary to further improve the relevant laws, regulations and judicial interpretations, and clarify the constitutive requirements and identification standards of crimes in false litigation.
3. Definition of the subject of crime: Who is the subject of crime in false litigation, including lawyers and other legal practitioners, should be clearly defined in laws and regulations.
4. Identification of criminal forms: The criminal forms of crimes in false litigation include preparation form, execution form and accomplished form. The identification of form should be combined with the comprehensive analysis of specific cases.
5. Legal liability: The legal provisions of crimes in false litigation lack clear legal liability, and relevant laws, regulations and judicial interpretations need to be further improved in terms of criminal punishment and civil compensation for crimes in false litigation.