Who should be defended for the crime of colluding in bidding?

Case: According to the provisions of Article 223 of the Criminal Law of China, the People's Procuratorate of a certain district investigated the criminal responsibility of the defendant Lu Mou for the crime of colluding in bidding. According to today's court investigation and cross-examination, combined with the facts and evidence of this case, the defender has no objection to the defendant Lu Mou's bid collusion crime accused by the procuratorate. We now put forward the following defense opinions on its lighter circumstances:

1. Defendant Lu played a minor role in the crime and could be given a lighter or mitigated punishment.

The defendant Lu's main behavior in this crime is to make a tender and contact the other two forms of tender.

, and finally won the bid, also is not about and control. Therefore, Lu's collusive bidding behavior did not play a major role, but played a secondary and auxiliary role. According to the provisions of the criminal law of China, those who play a minor role in the crime can be given a lighter or mitigated punishment.

Two, the case did not cause any losses, in sentencing can be considered lighter.

After the bidding, Zhou's Housing and Construction Bureau quickly discovered the collusive bidding behavior and issued a notice.

Invalid bid. Therefore, this case did not cause any economic losses. At this point, I hope the court will consider sentencing.

Third, the defendant Lumou voluntarily pleaded guilty during the trial, and he did show remorse for the crimes he committed.

According to the court's trial, the defendant Lu Mou voluntarily pleaded guilty. According to the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People.

Article 9 of the Opinions of the Procuratorate and the Ministry of Justice on Applying Ordinary Procedures to the Trial of "Cases in which the Defendant Pleads Guilty", the people's court shall, as appropriate, give a lighter punishment to the defendant who voluntarily pleads guilty. So I hope the court will give him a lighter punishment.

Fourth, the defendant Lu had a good conduct before committing the crime, and this crime was a first-time offense.

Five, this case can be a single fine, the defender believes that this case is a single fine.

In summary, the defender believes that the defendant Lu Mou has voluntarily pleaded guilty and other mitigating circumstances. It is hoped that the people's court will make a single fine ruling on the defendant Lu's behavior in accordance with the principle of combining punishment with salvation, combining the objective situation of this case and considering that the defendant Lu is a first-time offender.