On April 4, 20 16, a debt collection team composed of social idlers 10 people repeatedly harassed Sue's factory, abused and beat Sue. The day before the incident, Wu Xuezhan instructed his men to shit in the house mortgaged by Sue, put Sue in the toilet and asked him to pay back the money. In the afternoon, Su called 1 10 and the mayor's hotline four times, but they didn't get help.
The means of debt collection was upgraded, and Su and her son Yu Huan were taken to the reception room of the company together with an employee. 1 1 The debt collectors surrounded and controlled the three of them. In the meantime, the debt collector insulted Su with humiliating words, took off Yu Huan's shoes and put them on his mother's mouth, and even deliberately sprinkled ashes on Su's chest. Du Zhihao, a debt collector, even took off his pants, exposed his nakedness and abused Su, which made Yu Huan on the verge of collapse. Workers passing by outside saw this scene and asked Yu Huan's aunt Yu Xiurong to call the police.
After receiving the police, the police went to the reception room and said, "You can ask for accounts, but you can't hit people" and left. Seeing that the police were leaving, Yu Xiurong, who called the police, grabbed a policewoman and tried to stop the police car. "The police left at this time, and they only had a dead end." Yu Xiurong later said in an interview with reporters. Yu Huan, who was controlled by the debt collector, saw the police leave and collapsed. He stood up and tried to rush outside to call the police, but was stopped by the debt collector. In the chaos, Yu Huan pulled out a fruit knife from the table in the reception room and stabbed it, causing Du Zhihao and other four debt collectors to be stabbed. Among them, Du Zhihao died of hemorrhagic shock, and two others were seriously injured, 1 person was slightly injured.
judgement of first instance
In the first instance of this case, the People's Procuratorate of Liaocheng City, Shandong Province filed a public prosecution with Liaocheng Intermediate People's Court on 20110/2/0, accusing the defendant Yu Huan of intentional injury. Liaocheng Intermediate People's Court held a public hearing in June 5438+February 65438+May of that year to conduct a joint trial of this case.
Liaocheng Intermediate People's Court subsequently made a judgment: the defendant Yu Huan committed the crime of intentional injury, sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life.
Liaocheng Intermediate People's Court held that Yu Huan, the defendant, faced with the long-term entanglement of several debt collectors, could not correctly handle the contradictions. He stabbed many people with a sharp knife, causing 1 victims to die, 2 victims to be seriously injured and 1 victims to be slightly injured. His behavior has constituted the crime of intentional injury, and the public prosecution agency accused Yu Huan of intentional injury. The defendant Yu Huan committed the crime of intentional injury, with serious consequences, and should bear legal responsibilities commensurate with the criminal results. In view of the fact that the case was caused by the victim's gathering of many people, improper debt collection affected the normal business order of the enterprise, restricted the personal freedom of others, and insulted others, the victim was at fault, and the defendant Yu Huan was able to truthfully confess his crimes and punishments after he was brought to justice, and he could be given a lighter punishment.
The Supreme People's Procuratorate sent staff to investigate.
According to the Supreme People's Procuratorate news, the Supreme People's Procuratorate attached great importance to Yu Huan's intentional injury case in Liaocheng City. Sent to Shandong to read papers, listened to the report of Shandong Provincial Procuratorate, and is conducting a comprehensive review of the facts and evidence of the case. Whether Huan's behavior is justifiable defense, excessive defense or intentional injury will be examined and determined according to law; The police reported by the media have dereliction of duty in the process of law enforcement in this case and will be investigated and dealt with according to law.
According to the law and the criminal procedure rules of the people's procuratorates, the Supreme People's Procuratorate leads the work of local people's procuratorates at all levels and special procuratorates, and the people's procuratorates at higher levels have the right to revoke or change the decisions of the people's procuratorates at lower levels; If mistakes are found in the cases handled by the people's procuratorates at lower levels, they have the right to instruct the people's procuratorates at lower levels to correct them.