The man threw the car into the river with a forklift! What kind of responsibility should men bear in this matter?

In this case, the man should bear the dual responsibilities of civil compensation and intentional damage to property.

The man found that his private parking space was occupied and contacted the owner, but the other party refused to move the car. In a rage, the man hired a brake and threw the car that occupied his parking space directly into the river. This man's approach to this problem is extreme. He should bear civil liability for compensation in this matter, compensate the economic losses of the other owner, and bear the legal liability related to intentional damage to property. His behavior has been suspected of intentional damage to property.

After the owner found that his car was thrown into the river, he called the police at the first time. After the police arrived at the scene, they found the man and took criminal compulsory measures against him according to law. Another owner also fished his car out of the river with a crane. But the car has been seriously damaged and can no longer drive. The man will be held accountable, he will compensate himself and the police will punish the man according to law.

Owners have the right to control and use their own private parking spaces. After the parking space is occupied by others, it constitutes a civil tort. This is the best solution, that is, ask the property to intervene and coordinate the solution or contact the traffic police to ask the other party to help move the car. If the other party refuses to move the car, you can let the traffic police send a car to tow it away. But it is illegal to hire a forklift to throw the other car into the river. This kind of behavior is intentional damage to other people's property, and if the circumstances are serious, criminal punishment will be imposed.

The owner of the other party occupies the position of the man's private car, which constitutes a civil infringement. He can go to court and ask the other party to stop the infringement and compensate his own economic losses. Originally, this person was a victim, but because of his wrong way of doing things, he became the wrong party. Because of his impulsive behavior, the man has been criminally compulsory by the police according to law. What awaits him is criminal punishment, and he may be sentenced for the crime of intentionally destroying other people's property. At this point, it is no longer possible to compensate the other car owners for their economic losses and lose their freedom.