In fact, this case is not as complicated as expected. It is an objective fact that these eight people entered the room with guns. The owner and driver caused two deaths and three injuries. In fact, from the cause and effect of the case, Wang Mobo (the owner of the car) must belong to the defensive nature, and taking the act of "protecting himself" when the other party is armed and has a large number of people should be defined as legitimate defense.
However, such behavior led to Wang Mobo and Song Mouying being sentenced to 6 years and 7 years in prison for "intentional injury" respectively, and it was after the judgments of the first and second trials. This reminds me of the case that a high-speed rail ticket inspector killed an old man who took him to the station and was sentenced to two years in prison. If this is intentional injury, what is the behavior of the ticket inspector?
Things are a little far-fetched Let's keep talking about this case. The cause of the incident was the creditor's rights, and then some disputes occurred. Later, Wang Mobo, the driver of Song Mouying, got wind that someone was going to clean up Song Mouying, so Wang Mobo went to Song Mouying's home to inform him and then left, but was stopped by Zhang Mouhui and others in the process of leaving, and then Wang Mobo fled. But not long after, Wang Mobo returned to Song Mouying's home again. After the two agreed, they thought that Zhang Mouhui had been transferred to Yu, and it was Yu who had a dispute with Song Mouying.
That evening, Wang Mobo stayed at Song Mouying's house. After that, Song Mouying and Zhang Mouhui talked on the phone many times, and everyone knew afterwards. Zhang Mouhui found eight people to bring military thorns, sticks, machetes and other equipment to Song Mouying's community. After entering the door, the two sides began to cut each other, and the process was not described. In short, it finally led to serious consequences of 2 deaths and 3 injuries.
However, there are several important controversies. One is that Song Mouying and Wang Mobo did not choose to call the police when they learned that Zhang Mouhui wanted to retaliate against themselves. The other is that they also prepared weapons privately, and Song Mouying angered Zhang Mouhui at the time of the incident. Wang Mobo stayed at Song Mouying's home, which can be said to be fully prepared for this conflict.
So judging from the course of the incident, Song Mouying and Wang Mobo are in charge, but in fact they are not. If they choose to call the police first, after the police interviewed Zhang Mouhui, Zhang Mouhui obviously agreed, and then after the police left, they went to the door to provoke, which eventually led to an escalation of contradictions. I'm afraid this is another story.
But the problem is that this well-prepared way, but also take the initiative to let the other side into the house, is somewhat different from normal defense, so we can't say that the court's judgment is unfair, only that we don't know much about the law and the details of the case, so we think that "armed illegal invasion" should be regarded as legitimate defense.