"Crab Mom" is accused of "dividing state-owned assets privately"
The People's Procuratorate of Minhang District, Shanghai accuses that from May to October, 2007, the defendant Mei Xiaoyang took advantage of his position as the deputy director of the business planning office of Shanghai Landscape Design Institute and was in charge of the business contracting of the landscape design institute, and received a beauty card worth 20,000 yuan from Yu Changbin of Shanghai Yiyayuan Landscape Design Co., Ltd. and a thank-you from Shanghai Architectural Landscape Environment Design Co., Ltd. for 30,000 yuan. Shanghai Jinghui Architectural Design Co., Ltd. is 70,000 yuan. Mei Xiaoyang wants to surrender, but her husband Yang Haipeng thinks that his wife's surrender will affect his reputation. He wrote in his blog: "I told her: Are you forcing me to die? For her so-called career, I have paid for ten years and am willing to be a nanny; Now I have to pay for my reputation-for me, this is better than life. " In the end, Mei Xiaoyang refused to surrender and had no chance to get probation.
The lawyer said that the accusation of taking bribes was a complete distortion of the facts.
In the judgment, the court held that the first two allegations lacked conclusive and sufficient evidence and were not recognized. However, it is determined that Mei Xiaoyang took bribes of 70,000 yuan and used his position to seek benefits for the briber, which constitutes the crime of accepting bribes.
Mei Xiaoyang's lawyers Yan and Zhu Jieyu pleaded not guilty. They pointed out that the accusation of accepting a bribe of 70,000 yuan was a complete distortion of the facts.
Yan and Zhu Jieyu mentioned in their defense that there are three main reasons for the witness to give Mei Xiaoyang cash. First of all, Hu Shuguang is the deputy director of the Institute of Architectural Planning and Design of Shanghai Landscape Design Institute, and belongs to the outsourcing unit of the Landscape Design Institute. There are many customers who need maintenance, and Hu Shuguang has entrusted Mei Xiaoyang to maintain them for many times. The expenses incurred in this process cannot be borne by the landscape design institute, nor can it be borne by Mei Xiaoyang personally. Therefore, Hu Shuguang paid Mei Xiaoyang the money he had paid in advance. Secondly, Mei Xiaoyang, as a staff member of the sales department, also provided technical support for the projects that Hu Shuguang received, including drawings. So this fee also includes Mei Xiaoyang's personal part-time remuneration. Finally, and most importantly, in the subcontracted landscape design project of Suzhou Peony Pavilion Villa, Mei Xiaoyang also invited an industry expert Zhou with his personal relationship. Zhou is the second project leader of this project. In order to provide technical support, including drawings and conceptual design in the early stage of production, Mei Xiaoyang and Zhou jointly released the technical route and service plan of the project. The defendant reached an agreement with the contractor in the early stage of the project, and used the money involved to pay the weekly labor remuneration.
The lawyer pointed out that he confirmed that he hoped to pay Zhou's labor remuneration through Mei Xiaoyang after formally undertaking the project. On July 65, 1965, around 438+00, 10, when Hu Shuguang offered to give the defendant another 654.38+10,000 yuan, the defendant clearly told him that there was still 70,000 yuan left, so there was no need to give it any more. Therefore, the 70,000 yuan involved also includes Zhou's remuneration for providing technical services. However, when the project was actually undertaken, it was July 20 10. At this point, Meixiaoyang has been in prison, and there is no time to settle the expenses with Zhou.
However, according to the court's judgment, although the defendant repeatedly proposed to refund 70,000 yuan or use it for the preliminary expenses of new projects, it has not been put into action, so the fact of accepting bribes is established.
"Crab Dad" said that the key witness did not appear in court.
Yang Haipeng said that the witness and Zhou, who are crucial to the judgment of this case, did not get the judge's permission to testify in court.
In the face of the court's first-instance judgment, Yang Haipeng claimed that he was "burned inside". After his wife was detained and examined in July 20 10, he used his years of experience in investigating journalists by law to investigate the behind-the-scenes story of his wife's case, and posted a message on Weibo that "mother crab was wronged". He believes that the root cause of this case is that the Shanghai Landscape Design Institute 10 MBO plan ran aground, and the contradiction with the parent company of Construction Engineering Group "Garden Group" was further made public. In his view, the crab mother was arrested because the Garden Group trapped her and prevented a large number of possible business personnel from leaving; Then through her confession, the design dean who has "anti-bone" will be punished.
Yang Haipeng said he would definitely appeal for his wife.