1, the debate begins
2. declare the debate open
3. Introduce the teams and their positions.
Step 4 introduce team members
5. Introduce the rules, judges and staff.
6. Debate contest
7. Comments by the judges
8. The audience is free to ask questions, and the judges will score (at the same time).
9. announce the results of the competition
10 debate is over.
Second, the debate process.
1, defense and argumentation stage:
(1) Debate between pros and cons.
First, the pros and cons argue and post the main points. It must be completed within the specified time.
(2) support and oppose each other's arguments.
The arguments of the pros and cons demonstrate their own views in theory with concise words;
(3) There are two sides of the argument.
The positive three debates and negative three debates are analyzed in concise words respectively, which provides argument support for our point of view.
2. Free debate stage
Those in favor speak first, then those against, and those in favor and those against take turns to speak.
(at a relatively concentrated time)
3. Summary stage
The final statement is made by the four parties, summarizing their own views and refuting each other's main views.
(1) Concluding statement of the opposing four arguments
(2) A summary statement of the four positive arguments.
5. Audience questions: The audience asks questions from both players, and the players must answer patiently. The performance of both sides in the questioning stage is not recorded in the competition results.
6, the judges scoring stage
7. The judges will comment on the views of both sides and the debate process.
8. Publish results
Three. rules of debate
1, each team member must complete it within the specified time, and overtime will be regarded as abstention, and the total score of the team will be deducted by 5 points.
2. Rules of free debate
The free debate speech must take turns between the two teams. First, the player on the positive side speaks, and then the player on the negative side speaks. Both sides take turns until the time runs out.
(Each free debate will be completed within two hours, and the specific time of each debate will be stipulated separately. Each post is 60-800 words, and only one question can be asked at a time. )
Iv. evaluation criteria
(1) Five judges will be invited to evaluate the whole competition.
(2) Scoring criteria
1, the argument is clear, the argument is sufficient, the quotation is appropriate and the analysis is thorough.
2, quickly grasp each other's views and mistakes, refute to the point.
3, reflecting agility and strong coping ability.
4. Clear expression, clear hierarchy and strict logic.
(3) Scoring method (groups and individuals score separately, full score 100)
(1) Examination: Whether the position held can be understood from the perspectives of logic, theory and facts, whether the arguments are sufficient, whether the reasoning relationship is clear, and whether there are effective methods to deal with their own difficulties.
(2) Argument: whether the argument is convincing, whether the argument is sufficient, whether the reasoning process is logical, and whether the cited facts are appropriate and true.
(3) Refutation: Whether the question can grasp the key of the other party is simple and clear. If you don't ask questions or ask unclear questions within the specified time, you should deduct points appropriately. Whether to answer each other's questions directly can give people a sense of justification. If you don't answer or answer directly, you should deduct points accordingly.
(4) Cooperation: whether there is team spirit, whether there is mutual support, and whether the debate is closely linked. Whether the questions and answers form an organic whole gives the other party a powerful blow.
(5) Debate style: the language and debate style are polite. Don't make personal attacks on the opponent's defense friends and netizens.
(4) Deduction: Deduct points as appropriate for projects that do not meet the evaluation requirements and violate the rules. If the unexpected events caused by the team's own reasons affect the competition, the jury will decide to deduct 5- 10% from its cumulative total score.
(5) Scoring items
The evaluation table of team points and individual points for each competition is as follows:
(6) Scoring items
The evaluation form of team score and individual score for each competition is as follows: All competitions are the same.
Debate group score table
Group part
full marks
Positive score
Counterparty score
Argument statement
15
Free debate
25
Concluding remarks
20
Language expression
15
combine/join forces (with sb)
15
Coping ability
10
aggregate score
100
Debate competition individual score table
Group part
full marks
Masaichi
normal treatment
Masazo
normal treatment
Anti-one
Anti-two
Anti-three
Anti-four
Language expression
20
logical thinking
20
Refutation ability
15
On-site reaction
15
Holistic consciousness
20
Comprehensive impression
10
aggregate score
100
(7) The excellent debater in each competition is won by the winner and loser with the highest score respectively; The "best debater" in this competition is won by the person with the highest individual cumulative score, and the formula is: total score/participation times.
(8) Judgment of victory or defeat
1, the outcome of each game, according to the scores of several judges, remove a highest score and a lowest score, and calculate the average score of the remaining scores.
2. The calculation method of individual score of debater is the same as that of group score, which is only used as the basis for judging individual awards, and has nothing to do with judging the victory or defeat of each game.
Seven. Reward and reward
1. An excellent debater will be selected in each competition, and the best debater will be decided after the whole competition.