Defendant Tang Xiaolong, male, born on July 4th, 1985, ID number: (omitted), Han nationality, native of Neijiang City, Sichuan Province, junior high school education, farmer, living in (omitted). On April 25th, 20 17, he was criminally detained by Luqiao Branch of Taizhou Public Security Bureau and arrested on May 30th of the same year. He is currently being held in Taizhou luqiao district Detention Center.
Defender Chen Hui, lawyer of Zhejiang Li Hui Law Firm.
The People's Procuratorate of luqiao district, Taizhou City accused the defendant Tang Xiaolong of robbery with indictment No.443 (20 17), and filed a public prosecution with our court on August 3, 20 17. Our court formed a collegial panel according to law and heard the case in public. Taizhou luqiao district People's Procuratorate appointed Shen Dandan, the acting prosecutor, to appear in court to support the public prosecution. Defendant Tang Xiaolong and his defender Chen Hui participated in the lawsuit. The trial is now over.
It was found through trial that on the night of June 65438+10/October 65438+September 65438, the defendant Tang Xiaolong was summoned by Huang (sentenced) to Liu's temporary residence in Xingfengju, Fengjiang Street, and Huang claimed RMB 65438 from Liu on the grounds that his father Huang Weiyuan was accidentally injured at work. The next day, the defendant Tang Xiaolong accompanied Huang Xiangliu and asked for RMB 700 yuan. After identification, Ye Maohua was slightly injured.
Tang Xiaolong, the defendant, had no objection to the above facts during the trial, which was confirmed by the confession of accomplice Huang, the statement of the victim and Liu, the testimony of witnesses Huang Weiyuan and Xiong Taigang, identification transcripts and pictures, injury identification and arrest process.
The court held that the defendant Tang Xiaolong organized and ganged up to rob others' property on the spot by violent means for the purpose of illegal possession, and his behavior constituted robbery. Defendant Tang Xiaolong played a minor role in the joint crime of * * *, and was an accessory, and his punishment was mitigated according to law. The accusation of the public prosecution agency is clear in fact and accurate in nature. The defender suggested that the defendant was an accessory and had a good attitude of pleading guilty, and the punishment should be mitigated according to law, which was adopted by our court. According to the provisions of Article 263, Paragraph 1 of Article 25 and Article 27 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the verdict is as follows:
Defendant Tang Xiaolong was convicted of robbery, sentenced to two years and six months in prison and fined RMB 2,000 (the sentence is counted from the date of execution of the judgment). In case of detention before the execution of the judgment, one day of detention shall be reduced to one day of fixed-term imprisonment, that is, 201April 25 to 20 171October 24; The fine shall be paid within one month from the effective date of the judgment).
If you refuse to accept this judgment, you can appeal to the Intermediate People's Court of Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province through our court or directly within ten days from the second day of receiving the judgment. If a written appeal is filed, one original and two copies of the appeal shall be submitted.