The difference between risk agency and general agency

legal analysis: compared with the traditional agency system, risk agency has the following differences: first, the object of risk agency is difficult and complicated cases, especially those with great difficulty in execution, otherwise the client will not agree to risk agency. Second, the result of lawyer's agency is closely related to lawyer's compensation and investment recovery, that is, lawyers should not only bear the risk of not receiving fees, but also bear the risk of investment losses. This prompted the lawyers to strengthen their sense of responsibility. Third, the agreed fee ratio is relatively high, which is attractive to lawyers. Fourth, the client has a high degree of trust in the lawyer, and the lawyer has a relatively large authority to dispose of the substantive rights and interests of the case.

Legal basis: "Measures for the Administration of Charges for Lawyers' Services"

Article 11 In civil cases involving property relations, if the client still requests to carry out risk agency after being informed of the government's guidance price, the law firm may carry out risk agency charges, except in one of the following circumstances:

(1) Marriage and inheritance cases;

(2) requesting social insurance benefits or minimum living security benefits;

(3) requesting the payment of alimony, alimony, alimony, pension, relief fund and industrial injury compensation;

(4) requesting payment of labor remuneration.

Article 12 It is forbidden to implement risk agency fees in criminal litigation cases, administrative litigation cases, state compensation cases and group litigation cases.

article 13 where risk agency fees are charged, the law firm shall sign a risk agency fee contract with the client, stipulating the risk responsibilities, fee standards, fee amount or proportion that both parties should bear. Where risk agency charges are implemented, the maximum charge shall not be higher than 3% of the target amount of the charge contract.