Correct, only by standing on the basis of ontology (itself) can we know the object. If there is no subject, then the object is meaningless. Like, if there is no one, is there any point in debating?
The main body of the debate is the parties who hold different opinions. Who is the object of the debate?
The answer is yes.
Just finished
What is an object? What does it have to do with objective existence?
(1) The subject of cognition is people who engage in practical activities and cognitive activities under certain social conditions and social relations. The object of cognition is the object that the subject's practice and cognitive activities point to, and it is an objective existence that enters the field of human practice and is related to the subject, that is, the object of human practice and cognition.
(2) The relationship between cognitive subject and object mainly includes: first, the relationship between reflection and reflection, that is, cognitive relationship. Second, the two are the relationship between transformation and transformation, that is, the relationship between practice. Actual relationship is the basis of understanding. Third, the interest relationship between object and subject, that is, the value relationship. Fourthly, as the aesthetic subject, people appreciate, feel and experience the aesthetic object, that is, the aesthetic relationship.
I often stay up late to study before exams. Should I prepare supplements?
It depends on your physical condition. I don't think you need to prepare for a good sleep.
But I feel very tired psychologically, so I drink hot milk and coffee at this time.
Something like that. It works
Positive materials of the debate competition
1, unjust enrichment in civil law cannot prevent the establishment of theft in criminal law. The money from robbery is also unjust enrichment, isn't it robbery? Criminal law and civil law are two different systems, which do not affect each other. In civil, Xu Ting constitutes unjust enrichment, which should be returned. As long as Xu Ting meets the subjective and objective requirements of theft in criminal law, his behavior is theft.
Subjectively speaking, Xu Ting has the purpose of illegal possession, which can be explained by hiding and using stolen money and goods.
Objectively speaking, Xu Ting stole bank funds by secret means. For reasons, please refer to the Supreme Law "Judicial Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Theft Cases".
From the subject, Xu Ting is a person with normal thinking, who has reached the age of 18 and has full criminal responsibility.
Objectively speaking, Xu Ting's behavior has violated the legitimate ownership of bank funds.
To sum up the four points, Xu Ting's behavior has met the four elements of theft, so it certainly constitutes theft.
2. The Judicial Interpretation of the Supreme People's Law on Several Issues of Theft has explained that the so-called secret stealing refers to the subjective secret of the actor rather than the objective secret. That is, whether anyone saw it or not, as long as the actor thinks that his behavior is unknown, it can be considered as secret theft.
3. If it is the fault of the bank first, the criminal nature of Xu Ting's behavior cannot be prevented. The bank's fault was not the direct cause of Xu Ting's theft.
The mechanical failure of the bank leads to a program error, and it is not the only choice for depositors to spit out their money for themselves. Depositors can also choose to call the police or notify the bank to return it. If the depositor chooses to keep it for himself, it shows that there is subjectively vicious illegal possession.
Is the beauty of the debate subjective or objective?
Hello everyone! Does objective beauty determine people's feelings about beauty, or does people's subjective feelings create beauty? Today, we debaters are debating here to solve this eternal aesthetic problem. If beauty is subjective, that is to say, the existence of beauty today is entirely determined by personal subjective thoughts. But today, we want to tell you that the existence of beauty has certain rules. Because of this unchangeable law, the existence of beauty does not change with the subjective thoughts of people and individuals. This is our view: beauty exists objectively.
Beauty is the characteristic of a thing or behavior, which has three characteristics, namely: first, visualization; Second, infectivity; Third, utilitarianism. Image means that a thing must have a specific image or form if it wants to exert its beauty; Second, it must also be infectious, so that people can arouse their feelings of joy or love; Thirdly, it must be utilitarian and can give people spiritual and material benefits, such as evolution and utilization. Because the existence of beauty must be measured by these three characteristics, an objective law has emerged. And because we have to use this objective law to measure, how can the other party say that this is a subjective feeling!
In addition, the three characteristics of beauty are independent of people's subjective thoughts, and people's subjective feelings cannot change the laws of these three characteristics. In the process of appreciation, the relationship between subject and object can only be a process of feeling and being felt. It is the beauty of objective existence that causes people's aesthetic feeling, not the beauty of people that creates the beauty of objective things. Beauty will not change because of the subjective thoughts of the appreciator. The beauty of the pyramid always exists in the pyramid itself. Even if no one appreciates the pyramids, the beauty of the pyramids will last forever!
If there is no objective standard for beauty, that is, if it is based on personal subjective preferences, then hundreds of people have thousands of different standards. What's the difference between this and no standard? Of course, the beauty and ugliness of a thing may have different aesthetic feelings for different people, but these different aesthetic feelings come from different personal backgrounds, different aesthetic concepts and different personal accomplishments. Of course, we can appreciate beauty, discover beauty (time warning) and create beauty with the law of beauty, but we can't easily cancel beauty or deny its existence. If beauty is a subjective feeling, then I don't understand that the great goal of truth, goodness and beauty that human beings have been pursuing is completely meaningless. Because they vary from person to person and change at any time! The French aesthetician Diderot told us that the beauty of the Louvre will not disappear because of it, no matter whether there are people or not!
Tan Qi: If beauty and the feeling of beauty are not unified, then when this feeling reflects this objective existence, there must be a distinction between true and false. But we talked about so many beautiful angles and appreciation. Can you tell me which is right and which is wrong? It is better for me to give a concrete and objective example than to talk about subjectivity and objectivity with my opponent lightly. May I ask the other debater (holding a rose) to tell me, in everyone's eyes, is this the same flower? But is everyone's evaluation of beauty different? Sad people will say "where petals flow like tears"; And happy people will say "flowers smile at me"; A haggard person will say "people are thinner than yellow flowers"; And some happy people will say, "Peach blossoms set each other off in red"; Some people say that flowers have feelings, and the so-called "falling red is not a heartless thing, but turning into spring mud protects flowers more"; Some people say that flowers are heartless, "crazy catkins dance with the wind, and sparse (alert) peach blossoms follow the water." What is the reason? "Flowers are similar from year to year, and people are different from year to year", and objectively "flowers are from Shui Piao to water", which makes our subjectivity "a kind of lovesickness and two leisure places". Thank you. (warm applause)
CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Tan Qi. We also hope that after the debate, we can see which debater Tan Qi will give this bunch of flowers to everyone's subjective feelings. All right, finally, the closing stage. First of all, let's invite Lu Yiming, a student from both sides, to state his views. The time is 3 minutes.
Lu Yiming: What a free debate! But after careful analysis, under the eloquence of the other party, the other party not only cannot justify itself, but also has several very obvious shortcomings. First, the basis of the other party's argument is nothing more than that beauty can exist without people's subjective consciousness. So another free man told us that this Tang poem was shot abroad, and this person would find it beautiful even if he hadn't seen it. If this book ......
The theme of the debate is that I am important. Is it really important to contradict me?
Who proposed this debate? At first glance, it just hasn't been debated. The positive side has a "very", which is difficult to define. Negative without the word, the position becomes that I am not important. In other words, it is the debate between "I am important" and "I am not important". Isn't "I am important but not very important" a barrier between the two?
Pro: 1. For me, I am very important. During the debate, as a debater, I was very important to the development of the competition. If the other party thinks "I am not important", is it that you are not important as a debater, or that your two arguments and three arguments are not important?
I am very important to my family and I can take responsibility at work. I am very important to the people who are directly related to me. Importance does not mean that I am indispensable and irreplaceable. The important thing is to prove that I can influence the object and be cherished by the object. 2. From the perspective of what should be, establishing my important consciousness is the basis for people to give full play to their subjective initiative, stimulate their personal potential, create value for society and enhance their sense of social responsibility. Only when a person is aware of his own importance can he treat his behavior rigorously and prudently.
Think for yourself. Typing is exhausting.
Integrity debate draft 20 points
Copy and paste-
A white lie goes against honesty.
Debate statement
Chairman, judges and debaters, hello!
Honesty has been advocated since ancient times. From Confucius, "People can't stand without faith." For Mencius, "sincerity is the way of heaven and the way of being human." From "Standing at the Door" by Shang Yang to the modern "Outline for the Implementation of Citizen Morality", honesty, namely sincerity, trustworthiness and truth-seeking are all reflected. I will discuss our views from the following aspects: white lies violate honesty.
First: cut open the phenomenon to see the essence. Explaining a lie in a dictionary is a distortion of the facts, not a real thing. The beautiful appearance of things can always confuse some people's eyes. We have been taught not to tell lies since childhood as teachers. Lying is not a good boy, but when we put a good coat on lies, it hits the weakness of human nature and makes some people begin to accept white lies. But can you get rid of the fact that beggars wear cheongsam? Therefore, a white lie is still a lie, which violates seeking truth. Therefore, we believe that white lies violate honesty. You can use The Emperor's New Clothes to explain this argument concisely.
Second: ask the other party to be more rational and less emotional. The other party insists that telling white lies does not violate honesty. Is there too much emotion? It is an indisputable fact that adding the word goodwill in front of a lie takes it for granted that it is no longer a lie, and its motive is goodwill. I don't know that goodwill itself has certain uncertainty, so it is repeatedly used by some "professional scammers". So please open your rational eyes and look at the real problems of white lies! Don't "don't know the true face of a lie, just because you are kind!" " Ah! "
Thirdly, under the social background of contemporary China, what is the new connotation of honesty?
First of all, since the fundamental spirit of honesty is truth and innocence, people are required to respect objective laws and establish a realistic spirit. In the face of honesty, all insincerity and deception will be mercilessly exposed and criticized.
Secondly, as a value concept, honesty has the characteristics of fairness. It requires social groups to establish a fair and reasonable system, and requires every member of society to establish a fair attitude and selfless moral concept.
Thirdly, the humanistic spirit contained in honesty requires people to consciously abide by the law, be sincere and trustworthy, and establish values and ethics that are compatible with the market economic system and the society ruled by law. Harmony can not be established with white lies, but it is the embodiment of sincerity between people!
Finally, I want to tell another debater that a wolf in sheep's clothing is still a wolf after all! Therefore, we have always believed that white lies are against integrity.
Independent variables (2 independent variables): Scheme 1:
1: You have been talking about kindness. Are you a kind person?
be
2. Do you think you are good and others will think you are good?
This needs everyone's evaluation! ! !
3. Yes, it needs public evaluation. Doesn't this explain the uncertainty of goodwill standard? Let's change the subject. What is your understanding of lies?
Lies are divided into white lies and malicious lies. What we are going to discuss today is a white lie!
4. The other debater said it well. Since you attribute a white lie to a lie, can you say that a white lie is not a lie?
There is an essential difference between a white lie and a lie, which is no longer an understanding of the lie itself!
Do you think adding the adjective "goodwill" before a lie becomes truth? According to the logic of the other defense friend, why not call it the truth of goodwill, the truth of goodwill?
Goodwill is considering human nature and the situation of the parties! It is the perfect embodiment of morality!
6: Is it immoral for me to tell the truth euphemistically? You have been emphasizing that white lies have changed qualitatively, but you can't prove them, and you haven't strongly refuted our white lies or lies. Isn't this a contradiction? I hope you can give us and everyone a good explanation in the next debate! thank you
Attack and defense: Scheme 2:
1: You have been talking about kindness. Are you a kind person?
This needs everyone's evaluation! ! !
2. Yes, it needs public evaluation. Doesn't this explain the uncertainty of goodwill standard? Let's change the subject. What is your understanding of lies?
We are talking about white lies today, not lies. Please don't digress!
We didn't deviate from today's topic, just wanted to tell the other debater whether you deviated from a white lie. ......
Debate theme, is it law or morality that regulates people's behavior?
Firstly, discuss the limitations of law, and then discuss the advantages of morality in regulating human behavior.
Limitation of legal function
The deficiency or defect of fingering in regulating or influencing human behavior and social life. This is the basis of treating the function of law from a dialectical point of view and correctly understanding the limitations of the function of law.
Second, the performance of the limitations of the legal role.
Law is just one of many means of social adjustment.
Law is not the only way to adjust society. In addition to legal norms, there are social norms such as policies, disciplines, rules and ethics, as well as economic, administrative and ideological education. As far as establishing and maintaining the whole social order is concerned, law is a very important method. However, in some social fields, social relations and social life, law is not the main method to adjust social relations. For example, the sexual corruption of the staff of state organs and the sexual bribery of some parties, from the current laws and regulations of our country, there is no legal norm in this respect, and the crime of corruption and bribery in the criminal law only stipulates material interests but not spiritual interests. Some parties, in order to seek illegitimate interests, pay sexual bribes and accompany state functionaries, which are serious in nature, tarnish the integrity of state posts and cause social harm. What if there is no law and the harm is serious? This depends on the party's discipline and the morality of civil servants.
2, the scope of the law is not infinite, but limited.
Not all problems in social life are governed by law. The main and important aspects of social relations need legal adjustment, and their functions are very extensive, covering all aspects of economic, political, cultural and social life. However, in many fields of social relations and social life, it is not appropriate to adopt legal adjustment. For example, people's thinking, in the face of a ruling party, some people are advanced in thinking, while others are backward in thinking. Backward ideological laws cannot be effectively adjusted, and this problem can only be solved by ideological and political work. This is the limit of the scope of legal adjustment.
3. The role of law cannot cover a lifetime.
Social life is concrete, diverse and changeable. Once the law is promulgated, it is stable. Laws cannot be changed frequently, let alone frequently. Otherwise it will lose its authority and certainty. Therefore, it is impossible to include all social life in advance when legislating. There are still some gaps and inadaptability in the function of law.
For example, the problem of * * in marriage is that in divorce cases, during the appeal of the first-instance judgment, one party forcibly has sex with the other party, and one party thinks that it is fulfilling the rights and obligations of husband and wife, and the other party thinks that the relationship between husband and wife has been dissolved. The * * * stipulated in China's criminal law refers to the act of having sexual relations with women against their will. Its subject is male, subjectively intentional, and the object is the inviolable right of women, objectively it is violence or coercion. According to this regulation, this man is undoubtedly sentenced to * * *, but such a sentence will make China's * * * crime flood, and all disharmony between husband and wife may be suspected of * * *, which is not conducive to the stability of China's family. Therefore, it is necessary to make an agreement on the "man" who is the subject of the crime in the criminal law, that is, not including the husband.
Another example: the first divorce retrial in Beijing, the author has legal aid. In the first instance, a district court in Beijing decided to divorce, but neither party filed an appeal within the statutory appeal time limit. The first-instance judgment came into effect and the man remarried. Later, the woman found that the sole judge of the first instance was a clerk and did not have the qualification of a judge. The clerk acted as a judge, and the procedure was illegal. When the woman applies for retrial, the court of first instance starts the trial supervision procedure. The retrial decided to divorce, and the woman got paranoid psychosis for this. The reason is that the court procedure is illegal and leads to mental disorder, and the State Council is requested to pay compensation. However, the state compensation law does not stipulate compensation for mental damage, and the victims are often helpless. So far, it has failed. This is the blank of legal function and the defect of legislation.
4. Without the personnel, mental and material conditions required for the law to play its role in the implementation process, the role of the law cannot be started.
Without a professional team with good legal quality and professional ethics, no matter how good the law is, it is difficult to play its role. The spiritual conditions, cultural atmosphere, concept of rights and obligations and procedural consciousness of people and society directly restrict and influence the function of law. As for the restriction and influence of material conditions on legal functions, it is even more important. This is "learning law cannot be self-motivated, and learning goodness cannot be introspective". In the judicial field of our country, power is greater than law, money is greater than law, and the phenomenon of administrative intervention in the judicial field occurs from time to time, and the relationship between judges and lawyers, judges and parties lacks effective legal constraints. Our country from 200 1 judge law, procuratorial ......