On the loss of credibility from the case of doing righteous deeds: justice may be late, but it will not be absent

Because Zhao Yu published a long article in Weibo, saying that he "did good deeds to save people, but went to the detention center 14 days", he insisted that he did good deeds to help the victims. This incident caused great anger and uproar on the Internet. The reason why everyone was angry was that they felt brave and were detained. What is meaning and justice? Who dares to be a good person in the future?

Moreover, according to the official explanation, the girl and Li did have disputes and conflicts, and Li did hit the girl, but did not explain the rape. It also affirmed Zhao Yu's behavior, but it was not directly characterized as self-defense.

However, when the case is still full of doubts, people have lost patience in waiting for the truth. Many times, before the truth of the incident is revealed, we need to maintain a certain degree of rationality in order to "not be blinded by moral enthusiasm."

Zhao Yuxian shouted injustice, and people immediately took what he said as a fact and vented their dissatisfaction and anger in various ways without verification. For all kinds of media, as long as there are enough gimmicks and hot spots, it is enough to attract massive traffic. Even, in order to create hot spots, some media will deliberately guide conflicts. What is more frightening is that people don't believe what has been decided.

For a long time, with the intensification of life pressure, various social contradictions have emerged one after another, causing people's doubts about the legal system, distrust of law enforcers and lack of security. The public prefers to trust individuals rather than police.

Perhaps too many hot searches have disappeared inexplicably, perhaps too many events have sunk into the sea, perhaps yet we called and urged a thousand times before she started toward us's warning, or perhaps an apology for avoiding the important. Perhaps, when the police handle cases, they conform to the procedures and rules and regulations. However, an oversight in implementation and an omission in the process will lose credibility. At this time, the people began to understand that only by creating hot spots to attract the attention of society and the people can they ensure their fairness and justice.

Therefore, in the incident of "being arrested for being brave", public opinion has been one-sided before the facts have been fully announced and all kinds of fog have not been uncovered. "Do you dare to be brave in the future?"

People's trust in public power is being shaken.

When a public power loses its credibility, whether it is true or false, good or bad, it will be questioned by the people and public opinion. Even when this incident was officially reported, many people did not recognize it and were unwilling to accept it.

At present, the truth seems less important. For netizens, what I want is justice, and what I don't want is dark manipulation.

Don't let anger blind us!

What are we talking about when it comes to law? Justice. Yes, we need justice, and the judiciary must be independent and fair.

But when it comes to ourselves, what we need is often not justice, but our own needs and rights. We always want to rely on public opinion to influence justice! Many comments on this incident are one-sided, and the initial situation is described by the parties themselves. We are willing to believe that the situation exists, and whether there is something hidden in the details is unknown.

Everyone is talking about injustice, saying injustice and asking where justice is, but everyone may get hurt, and we say we ignore it, but when we or they get hurt, we still hope that justice will exist, exist forever and will not disappear.

When you, he, I and we suffer similar injuries again, we still hope that someone can stand up and stop, help you, help him and help all of us.

Justice may be late, but it will not be absent!