1. The appraisal shall prevail, but if there is any objection to the appraisal opinion, you can apply for re-appraisal. If there are still objections, a strong cross-examination will be conducted during the court session: for example, whether to replace or repair the car door on the basis of appraisal. Sentencing steps: determine the starting point of sentencing according to the basic crime constitution facts proved by evidence, then determine the benchmark punishment according to other crime constitution facts proved by evidence, and finally determine the sentencing according to the sentencing circumstances proved by evidence. 2. Substantive evidence: Without access to the substantive evidence of the case, lawyers can't determine innocence or misdemeanor, or plead sentencing, so they can't make a judgment prediction-a good case result is made, not predicted out of thin air. There is no lightest and heaviest sentence. 3. Limitations of consultation: consultation only solves the problem of finding a lawyer. Through consultation, you can find a lawyer you think is suitable; Consultation can't solve the problem of the case itself, because you can understand that without the rights of lawyers and the practical experience of knowledge and skills accumulated by lawyers through many cases, practical problems can't be solved. Moreover, lawyers gradually carry out specific criminal defense work around the evidence of the whole case, which is a complex and concrete process-thousands of cases become thousands of ways of playing, and you can't fully understand it. At the first time, I entrusted a criminal defense lawyer specializing in criminal defense business. Criminal defense is a process, a step-by-step process of specific work with the examination, judgment and application of criminal evidence as the core. Lawyers are professionals, and like doctors, they specialize in civil and criminal defense. Therefore, criminal defense lawyers specializing in criminal defense business should be entrusted.
Legal objectivity:
"Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Proceedings" Article 37 The people's court shall, after receiving the appraisal, send a copy to the parties in time. If the parties have objections to the contents of the appraisal, they shall put forward them in writing within the time limit specified by the people's court. The people's court shall ask the appraiser to explain, explain or supplement the objections raised by the parties. When the people's court deems it necessary, it may require the appraiser to explain, explain or supplement the contents that the parties have not raised objections. "Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Litigation" Article 38 If the parties still have objections after receiving the written reply from the appraiser, the people's court shall apply for re-appraisal according to the provisions of Article 40 of the Measures for Payment of Litigation Fees. In any of the following circumstances, the people's court shall allow it: (1) the appraiser does not have the corresponding qualifications; (2) The appraisal procedure is seriously illegal; (three) the expert opinion is obviously insufficient; (four) other circumstances in which the expert opinion cannot be used as evidence. In case of any of the circumstances mentioned in Items 1 to 3 of the preceding paragraph, the appraisal fee already charged by the appraiser shall be refunded. Refuse to return, in accordance with the provisions of the second paragraph of article eighty-first. If the defects in the appraisal opinions can be solved by means of correction, supplementary appraisal or supplementary cross-examination and review, the people's court shall not allow the application for re-appraisal. Re-appraisal, the original appraisal opinion shall not be used as the basis for determining the facts of the case.