Content and reasons for the suggestions on the housing problems in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village in our city: At the end of 2009, Antuoshan (due to reports from the masses about the quality of fire doors, last year the Municipal Public Security Bureau Fire Department invited The Fire Department of the Ministry of Public Security went to the site to randomly inspect 6 types of fire doors and sent them to the Tianjin Testing Center for testing. The test results showed that 4 types of fire door products were unqualified. At the end of March this year, they conducted on-site sampling again and sent them to the Tianjin Testing Center for testing. They passed the test and met the fire safety standards) and Shenyun The village housing project has been basically completed. Currently, more than 4,600 homes in two large residential complexes remain unprocessed. All sectors of society are very concerned about the housing issues in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village. But what exactly are these houses, and to whom and how? Government departments have not officially released relevant information to the public. From the public information of the Shenzhen Municipal Construction and Public Works Department, we can see that these two houses are constructed by the Municipal Residential Engineering Management Station, and the project names are Antuoshan Affordable Housing and Shenyun Village Affordable Housing respectively. Obviously, both projects were built in the name of affordable housing. It is obvious to all that these more than 4,600 units of "affordable housing" are not intended for low-income citizens in the city, but are allocated to personnel in public institutions, which is actually welfare housing for public institutions in Shenzhen. The former Shenzhen Land and Real Estate Bureau once responded to the consultation and stated that the application conditions for housing in Antoine Village and Shenyun Village are: before December 31, 2002, those who meet the conditions for purchasing full-price small loan housing are: 1. December 2002 Before December 31, 2002, the household registration has been transferred to the financial appropriation unit of Shenzhen City and moved to the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone; before December 31, 2002, the marriage (or divorce) procedures have been completed, and the household registration of the spouse (or child) is before December 31, 2002 Has moved to Shenzhen Special Administrative Region and moved his household registration to Shenzhen Special Administrative Region. Before December 31, 2002, the spouse (the children are a single-parent family) moved to Shenzhen City and did not purchase any real estate except commercial houses. The two residences were built in the name of affordable housing, but were actually targeted allocation of welfare housing. At the same time, the processing was delayed, which had a negative impact on Shenzhen. Recently, it was revealed that Rizhao City, Shandong Province was building 3,500 units of public housing in an "absolutely" prime location in the city, causing public outcry. At the same time, in Mei County, Shaanxi Province, which was caught in a whirlpool of public opinion, the media revealed that the county's first large-scale affordable housing "City View" community had started construction, with 610 units in the first phase, and 409 units for staff of departments affiliated with the county party committee and county government. In April this year, the media also disclosed that a civil servant in Anqiu City, Shandong Province said that his unit purchased a local high-end commercial housing at a low price. Immediately afterwards, the Ministry of Agriculture was also exposed to group purchases of targeted low-price housing. Netizens in Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province were also "not to be outdone" and posted a list of "Shijiazhuang civil servants' group purchase of low-priced housing" online. In December 2009, it was also revealed that Xianyang City, Shaanxi Province had earmarked 224 acres of land for the construction of more than 2,600 units. Housing", sold to civil servants at low prices. These situations have brought adverse effects to the corresponding places. Therefore, Shenzhen urgently needs to properly handle the housing problems in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village. The main reasons are as follows: First, public information is not transparent and the masses have opinions. Regarding the housing issues in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village, from the start of construction to the completion today, the relevant departments of the Shenzhen Municipal Government have never formally held a meeting or issued a notice to release the corresponding specific information to the public. It is only scattered in the media and among the people. It is obviously welfare housing allocated to government agencies and institutions, so why is the project established in the name of affordable housing? In the absence of sufficient authoritative information, the general public can only rely on speculation and rumors. Second, although it is called affordable housing, its construction standards are far higher than ordinary affordable housing. The housing projects in Antuoshan and Shami Village are not ordinary affordable housing projects. Construction data shows that it is a large-scale high-rise residential complex in our city that adopts water-saving, energy-saving, and environmentally friendly designs on a large scale. It is also an energy-saving demonstration residential project of the former Ministry of Construction. It even has the largest solar hot water system at home and abroad, and has also built residential buildings at home and abroad. The largest gray water treatment system in the community. The largest unit is 140 square meters, and the smallest is 90 square meters. According to the latest draft of Shenzhen’s affordable housing construction standards, 80% of affordable housing should be units with an area of ??less than 80 square meters. Today, the phenomenon of "luxury housing" in affordable housing has been deeply hated by all sectors of society. Third, there are several apartments where civil servants are still eligible to apply for housing, which has caused controversy.
There are more than 4,600 households in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village that are eligible for housing. How many of them have not yet obtained housing, and how many are waiting to obtain housing? In the eyes of ordinary people, those who worked in government agencies and institutions before 2002 received various benefits and benefits that were at least as good as those of low-income people in cities. What reason is there to fight for "affordable housing"? At the same time, according to cases investigated by Nandu, most of the people who are eligible for housing allocation own one or more houses in Shenzhen. The public is angry and worried that once affordable housing is allocated, some people will immediately resell the houses at high prices and make millions of dollars in profit. Information currently circulating shows that the government's asking price for houses in Antuoshan and Shamen Village is 4,800 yuan per square meter, while the surrounding housing prices are nearly 30,000 yuan. Fourth, resolving issues left over from history lags behind the policies of the State Council and Guangdong Province. The resettlement housing in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village is to solve the historical problems left by Shenzhen's "housing reform". The theoretical basis for the construction of these two large-scale welfare houses is the "Shenzhen Municipal Government Institutions Monetary Housing Allocation Reform Implementation Plan" (Shenfu [2003] No. 104) that was implemented on June 6, 2003. The document proposes that for employees who meet the conditions for purchasing full-price low-profit housing before December 31, 2002 but have not purchased it, one of the solutions is for the government to plan and build a certain number of affordable housing and sell it to these cadres and employees. However, according to the national housing reform policy, physical distribution of housing was stopped in the second half of 1998, and housing distribution was gradually monetized. On December 2 of the same year, the Guangdong Provincial People's Government's "Notice on Accelerating the Reform of the Housing System and Implementing Monetary Housing Allocation" (Guangdong Government [1998] No. 82) clearly stipulated that from January 1, 2000, the entire province will The current housing reform policy stops the sale and rental of public housing. Enterprises should also refer to the implementation. It can be clearly seen that compared with Guangdong Province’s housing reform policy, Shenzhen lags behind in implementation by more than three years. At the same time, Shenzhen also decided to re-plan and build "affordable housing" (welfare housing) to solve "problems left over from history." Fifth, one of the conditions for housing application in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village is that one must get married (or divorced) before December 31, 2002. This definition is unfair. How to deal with government officials and employees who got married (or divorced) after 2003? It is unfair to apply one-size-fits-all rules to cadres and workers who marry young or late. Sixth, delays in processing can easily lead to a crisis of trust in the government. The construction of resettlement houses in Antuoshan and Shamen Village started even later, on December 27, 2005 and November 2007, respectively. The specific allocation and processing of housing has been delayed again and again and has not been announced yet. At that time, when the Antuoshan and Shenyun Village housing projects started, relevant leaders stated that they would ensure that residents would move into their new homes before the end of 2008. A project has been delayed for seven years. During these seven long years, relevant government departments have repeatedly failed to fulfill their promises without making any public explanation. Seventh, the house has been built, and the long delay has obviously resulted in a waste of resources. At the end of last year, the village houses on An Tuo Shan and Sham Wan were basically completed. There are still more than 4,600 remaining houses in the two places, which have been vacant for more than half a year without any treatment. Conservative calculation shows that the remaining construction area is at least more than 600,000 square meters. Even if the rent is calculated at 50 yuan/month/square meter, leaving it vacant for half a year will result in a loss of rent of 180 million yuan. First of all, government departments should officially announce the specific situation of the residential buildings in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village as soon as possible. What were these two houses built for? Assigned to whom? How to distribute? These two residential complexes were built in the name of affordable housing at the expense of taxpayers, and the public has a right to know where these houses are going. In addition, modern communication science shows that information disclosure is the best way to dispel all kinds of hearsay rumors. Secondly, widely solicit opinions from all walks of life, hold hearings, or initiate a special research meeting of the National People's Congress to study how to deal with the houses in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village. Putting thorny issues under the sun can minimize gray room for maneuver, reduce people's dissatisfaction, and more importantly, promote the proper resolution of problems left over from history. The third is to organize a neutral institution to participate in the government investigation to fully understand the current residential ownership situation of more than 4,600 households that originally met the allocation conditions. Publicize supervision complaints** and allow the public to participate. Through a comprehensive investigation, public doubts are eliminated, which not only prevents wealthy people from fishing in troubled waters in an attempt to make profits, but also avoids allocating houses to people who really need them, and avoids the occurrence of vicious incidents. Fourth, truthfully announce the investigation results and properly handle the Antuoshan housing issue based on the investigation results. No matter how it is handled, the basic principles of fairness, openness and fairness must be followed. The government should act in good faith and try its best to reduce public dissatisfaction and instability.
Fifth, we must consider both historical issues and the current situation, and treat applicants who meet the conditions for public housing allocation in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village differently. Government departments should take into account the interests of all parties and steadily promote the resolution of the public housing issues in Antuoshan and Shenyun Village. Sixth, whether to consider auctioning these two houses, this has many benefits. (1) Part of the funds obtained from the auction can be used to provide certain compensation to those who originally met the conditions for housing allocation. This is also one of the measures to implement the monetization policy of housing reform; those who were originally allocated housing and have actual difficulties in living can be included in Shenzhen's affordable housing The supply scope, after passing the corresponding review, can be allocated to affordable housing; if it falls within the talent identification standards, it can be included in the overall planning of the Shenzhen Talent Housing Project. (2) The remaining funds from the auction can be used as special funds for the construction of affordable housing, which will alleviate the shortage of funds for affordable housing construction in Shenzhen to a certain extent. (3) More than 4,600 housing units are on the market, which can increase the supply of Shenzhen’s property market and have positive significance for stabilizing the property market. The total construction area of ??Antuoshan and Shenyun Village is nearly 1 million square meters. Previously, the Municipal Planning and Land Commission estimated that the city could form a supply of commercial housing with a construction area of ??about 10 million square meters in 2010. If Antuoshan Housing enters the market, it will be equivalent to an increase of one percentage point in the supply of commercial housing in Shenzhen in 2010. The seventh is to coordinate welfare housing, talent housing, affordable housing, and affordable housing, and integrate them into the government's public housing system as a package of housing policies. Yang Jianchang, deputy to the Fifth People’s Congress of Shenzhen City 2. Legal basis:
Article 81 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China and the State may be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment or more if there is evidence to prove the facts of the crime. Criminal suspects or defendants shall be arrested if the measures of release on bail pending trial are not sufficient to prevent the occurrence of the following social dangers: (1) Those who may commit new crimes; (2) Those who may commit new crimes; (3) If there is a possibility of committing a new crime; (4) If there is a possibility of committing a new crime, he should be arrested, he should be arrested, he should be arrested. (2) There is a real danger of endangering national security, public security, and social order; (3) It is possible to destroy or falsify evidence, interfere with witnesses’ testimony or collude with witnesses; (4) It is possible to crack down on victims, reporters, and accusers Revenge; (5) Suicide or escape attempt. When approving an arrest or making a decision to arrest, the nature and circumstances of the suspect or defendant involved in the crime, as well as their confession and punishment, shall be considered as factors in determining whether they may be dangerous to society. If there is evidence that the crime may be punished by a fixed-term imprisonment of more than ten years, or there is evidence that the crime may be punished by a fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, or if there is evidence that the crime may be punished by a fixed-term imprisonment of more than 10 years, or if the person commits the crime intentionally, or the identity is unknown, he shall be arrested. Criminal suspects and defendants who are on bail pending trial or under residential surveillance may be arrested if they violate the regulations on bail pending trial or under residential surveillance, and the circumstances are serious.