Background information: "Du Baoliang case"
Enlightenment and test of "Du Baoliang case"
Xinhuanet Anhui Channel 2005-06-20 07:5 1
The "Du Baoliang case" has finally entered the legal process, which is the result that public opinion sincerely expects. No matter what the final ruling of this administrative lawsuit is, it has become a very vivid civil rights enlightenment lesson. In this civil rights enlightenment class, Du Baoliang himself was the first to be changed. Du Baoliang, the former vendor who had to pay a fine of 10500 yuan because he was photographed by electronic eyes for 10500 times in the same place in just a few months, had two changes after media attention and the assistance of lawyers: First, he changed his habit of not reading newspapers frequently in the past and read newspapers bought from nearby newsstands every day; Second, he used to think that going to court was disgraceful, but now he has changed his mind. An honest vegetable farmer began to read newspapers carefully, which shows that he began to pay attention to current events; He no longer thinks that going to court is "disgraceful" and understands that he can protect his legitimate rights and interests through legal means, which shows that he is not satisfied with being a "submissive" who has to submit to humiliation, but wants to be an upright citizen.
Du Baoliang's three identities are widely representative in contemporary China: a farmer, a farmer who goes to the city to make a living, and a driver who uses a minivan as a means of transportation. Compared with urban residents, urban white-collar workers and civil servants, and traffic police who are used to exercising absolute power on the road, Du Baoliang is always in a weak position. However, in order to protect his legitimate interests, he can confront government agencies and seek judicial decisions. Then, why not all farmers, all migrant workers and all car drivers? The acceptance of "Du Baoliang case" is definitely not a simple event. Through this incident, more knowledge of civil rights has been and will continue to be spread.
Behind Du Baoliang, there are two excellent first teachers. In the news media, many newspapers reported his experience in full pages, and many TV stations aimed at him; The lawyer who provided him with legal aid not only complained strongly about his rights, but also publicly exposed the obvious marking errors that the traffic control department "may" have. One is the news media, and the other is the lawyer, who is the best mentor to undertake the task of civil rights enlightenment at this stage. Besides the Du Baoliang case, people expect them to do more.
Admittedly, due to various reasons, the judicial decision may have made a negative result for Du Baoliang. However, this is not important, because the progress of civil rights itself is a process of constant game, negotiation and consultation. On the other hand, if Du Baoliang loses the case, it can just test the realistic gap of civil rights.
The following is the reply:
Since ancient times, being born in public houses has become the lifelong creed of many people. The so-called no entry, no complaining in the yamen. Officials also have the saying that people don't sue officials and don't investigate. How many grievances are hidden in these two sentences!
There's another saying in China: The entrance of Yamen is rushing south, and you can't get in without money.
The result of litigation is often that the government eats the defendant and the plaintiff eats the plaintiff. Finally, the result of falling into family wealth.
With the development and progress of the times, today is a society ruled by law. The world's view of litigation has also changed.
Judging from the above news reports, going to court is at least not a disgraceful thing in people's understanding. Things in the world are not black and white. Now that people have changed, more and more people are beginning to think that it is a glorious thing to go to court. Judging from the above information, this Du Baoliang is very glorious after the lawsuit. It has become the focus of TV stations, and both the media and lawyers have made contributions to it.
The above is for reference only. I hope it will attract more attention and wish the debate a success.