New news has come out again about Liu Qiangdong’s case. It is reported that a public hearing will be held on April 25, local time in the United States. The applicant for this hearing is Liu Qiangdong’s lawyer. He hopes to prohibit Liu Jinyao’s lawyer from asking some private questions, including Liu Qiangdong’s relationship with the system, Liu Qiangdong’s personal financial situation, personal relationship status, etc. Liu Jingyao himself may also attend the hearing. Liu Qiangdong's case has escalated again, the 3 o'clock motion hearing has been cancelled, and Liu Jinyao may be restricted from asking questions
The media revealed that the Liu Qiangdong case will be restarted after two years, and a public hearing will be held in the United States, triggering Netizens are hotly discussing that this hearing mainly focused on the three-point motion proposed by Liu Qiangdong. The first point is that you cannot interfere with Liu Qiangdong’s relationship with the system. The second point is his personal financial status. The third point is Liu Qiangdong’s past informed consent relationship. In addition, Liu Qiangdong expressed his hope that the hearing would not be made public, but the judge refused. It is precisely because of this that Liu Qiangdong applied to cancel the hearing. After the incident was exposed, netizens sparked heated discussions. Did Liu Qiangdong's approach limit Liu Jinyao's questioning?
Most netizens know quite well why Liu Qiangdong refused to answer these three questions. The relationship between Liu Qiangdong and JD.com is still unclear. It is unknown whether there are other things in it. I wonder if there is any content that cannot be made public. Personal financial status and informed consent are Liu Qiangdong's privacy, but from his refusal to provide informed consent, it can be seen that there is something fishy here. I wonder if Milk Tea knows about this. If not, that would be interesting.
It is reported that the Liu Qiangdong incident began in 2018. Liu Qiangdong was accused of assaulting a female college student in Minnesota, USA. or spread rumors, necessary legal action will be taken. After the incident was exposed, Wang Sicong, a melon-eater, also publicly teased Liu Qiangdong, saying that the two parties had not reached an agreement on the price issue. But later he changed his mind and said it was a joke, if Liu Qiangdong is not such a person.
In December 2018, after investigation, the relevant departments stated that the evidence was seriously insufficient and would not prosecute. This means that Liu Qiangdong’s case is officially closed and Liu Qiangdong is not guilty. He himself also publicly apologized afterwards, saying that he was the one causing trouble to his family and wife, and he was very regretful! In April 2019, a female college student publicly sued Liu Qiangdong again and released more evidence. He denied the claim that the immortal danced and told the story of the incident, sparking controversy again.
Now, three years have passed since the female college student sued again, and the case is being retried again. I wonder what will happen in the meantime? Is Liu Qiangdong restricting Liu Jingyao's speech to protect his privacy, or is there more unknown things? Let's wait and see, maybe this matter will eventually reverse.