The director was arrested and his lover stabbed her husband to death during the fight. Was it intentional injury or self-defense?

The woman brought her lover home to rent a house, but was caught by her husband who was hiding at home. After the husband stabbed his wife, he intended to attack her lover, but was unexpectedly killed by her lover. I think my lover's behavior was self-defense.

First, the lover did not want to kill her husband at first. The lover and the man's wife went to check out a house. He didn't know that person was home. He and that woman went home and checked into a room just for the sake of ambiguity and a temporary separation. At this time, he didn't want to murder the woman's husband.

But what I didn’t expect was that the woman’s husband suddenly ran out after the husband killed his wife. He wanted to attack his lover. If a lover acts defensively when someone else violates him, it is legitimate defense.

Second, this lover is overly defensive. If there is no husband, the lover does not want to hurt him. If the husband doesn't press hard, the lover won't fight back.

Instead, the husband had a plan and he wanted to hurt them both. The lover killed her husband in the face of his injury. I think it was legitimate defense, but it was too defensive. Because he could knock the husband unconscious or otherwise control him, he could act defensively without ending the husband's life. Therefore, what the lover did to the husband was legitimate defense, but it was excessive defense.

This lover behaved immorally by dating someone else’s wife. When he was caught by others, he didn't want to do anything to the husband. It's just that this husband is pressing harder and harder to poison his life. He had to resist, his purpose was to protect himself. His actions were self-defense.

How would you evaluate this lover’s behavior? Do you think his actions were self-defense? Welcome to leave a message below to share your views!