In the case of Gavin Gao, what closing arguments were against Gavin Gao?

The trial of Gavin Gao and producer Jing Wong continues. Both the prosecution and the defense made closing statements. At present, the trial has reached the most critical stage, and the verdict is about to be closed. What remains is that the judge needs to judge according to the final opinion of the jury. However, the case that was clear before seems to have twists and turns again. Jing Wong's lawyer, Gavin Gao's lawyer and the prosecution's closing arguments are all revealing each other's experiences. This situation stumped the jury, and the prosecution's closing statement still found Gavin Gao guilty of indecency.

On March 26th, 20 18, the TV series "Anaya's Love" filmed by Gavin Gao and producer Jing Wong in Australia ended successfully. So the crew held a closing party to celebrate, with the participation of China team including Gavin Gao and producer Jing Wong, and Australian Chinese female producer Zhang Xi (the female victim in this case). After dinner, a group of people came to the karaoke room to sing until about 2 am. The female producer followed Jing Wong to Shangri-La Hotel, and then Gavin Gao joined in. The next morning, the husband of the female producer called the police, and Gavin Gao and Jing Wong were arrested one after another.

From the end of March 2065438 to the present, Gavin Gao and Jing Wong have been tried by the courts in Australia. Zhang Xi, a female victim, accused Gavin Gao and Jing Wong of sexual assault and serious gang indecency. For two years, the case has been in court, and evidence was obtained behind closed doors. Finally, this year, it entered the closing stage of both the prosecution and the defense!

First of all, the prosecution made a final closing statement on this case. The prosecution said that the core of this case is whether the jury trusts the testimony of the female client, and it is not necessary to believe everything she said, because her testimony also mentioned many uncertainties. In addition, the prosecution also said that Jing Wong tried to create a story and hinted at an image in which a female client kissed him and flirted with him in a karaoke bar, and then voluntarily returned to the hotel to have sex with Jing Wong. Later, because she was afraid of her husband's anger, the female client lied that she was sexually assaulted in the hotel!

At the same time, the prosecution's closing statement also mentioned Jing Wong's physical problems, so the female client will have a lot of uncertainty about the situation at that time!

In the closing statement against Gavin Gao, the prosecution raised many questions, but firmly believed that the testimony of the female client proved that Gavin Gao knew that the female client did not agree, so although Gavin Gao's crime of gang indecency was not established, Gavin Gao's crime of indecency was still established!

The prosecution's closing statement is obviously not conducive to Gavin Gao's final judgment!

At two o'clock in the afternoon, lawyer Gavin Gao made a final closing statement, arguing that the prosecution's accusation against Gavin Gao only depended on the testimony of the female client and completely relied on the integrity of the female client. However, since the trial began, the female client has changed her testimony many times, which is obviously a lie, so her integrity cannot be trusted, and Gavin Gao should be acquitted!

Lawyer Gavin Gao was followed by lawyer Jing Wong's closing statement, which listed a lot of video evidence. For example, after Gavin Gao entered the room, the female client cancelled the taxi waiting downstairs at that time and deliberately concealed this from the police. In a word, Jing Wong's lawyer still insists that the female client Zhang Xi is a voluntary act!

Originally, after the closing arguments of the three parties ended, the court would make a verdict according to the final resolution of the jury, but I didn't expect the jury in Australia to be as entangled as the local court. The jury didn't express their opinions in court, so it will have to be heard tomorrow!

In this case, the prosecution and the defense accused each other in their closing statements, exposing each other's misery layer by layer. No matter how the case ends, all three parties are losers!