With the acceleration of commercialization and marketization of scientific and technological achievements, enterprises are increasingly aware of the importance of scientific and technological achievements evaluation. So why is it so important to evaluate scientific and technological achievements? Do you really understand?
First, what is the evaluation of scientific and technological achievements?
Evaluation of scientific and technological achievements, or evaluation of scientific and technological achievements, refers to the process that the evaluation subject makes a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative judgment on the value of scientific and technological achievements according to relevant standards, regulations, methods and expert opinions.
Evaluation of scientific and technological achievements is usually called appraisal of scientific and technological achievements. On August 20 16, the Ministry of Science and Technology abolished the Measures for Appraisal of Scientific and Technological Achievements, and the traditional appraisal of scientific and technological achievements officially withdrew from the historical stage. The evaluation of scientific and technological achievements shall be conducted by a professional evaluation institution entrusted by the entrusting party. This means that China is exploring the establishment of a new market-oriented evaluation mechanism for scientific and technological achievements. The evaluation of new scientific and technological achievements will be dominated by the market, which will also directly promote the transfer and transformation of scientific and technological achievements and technology transactions.
Second, what is the significance of scientific and technological achievements evaluation?
Scientific and technological achievements are the crystallization of hard work of scientific and technological workers and an important source of national intellectual and material support. Scientific evaluation of scientific and technological achievements is an important means to test the quality of scientific research tasks, measure the contribution of researchers, and evaluate the scientific significance and application value of scientific and technological achievements, and it is also an important prerequisite for whether scientific and technological achievements can be transformed into real productive forces. With the in-depth implementation of China's innovation-driven development strategy, the significance of scientific and technological achievements evaluation in promoting the transformation of scientific and technological achievements has been paid more and more attention by government departments at all levels and all walks of life. As an important link in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, the evaluation of scientific and technological achievements is the "golden key" to start the transformation of scientific and technological achievements.
3. What is the function of scientific and technological achievements evaluation?
1. Industry recognition. Authoritative scientific and technological assessment reports are "passports" and "risk certificates" recognized by investment and financing institutions and industries, thus promoting the market-oriented application and promotion of results.
2. Auxiliary materials. The objective evaluation report of scientific and technological achievements is an important proof material for obtaining government and applying for government special funds.
3. Technology trading. Through the strict review and comprehensive evaluation of the whole process of technology research and development and innovation achievements, the language of science and technology will be transformed into market language, which will reduce the information asymmetry and communication and negotiation costs of both parties and improve the transaction efficiency.
4. Project financing. A comprehensive and scientific technical evaluation report is conducive to project financing, cooperative development, promotion and transformation of achievements and industrialization.
5. Technical improvement. Objective and comprehensive quantitative analysis and expert qualitative analysis can diagnose the risks and shortcomings of the evaluation object, provide solutions for the improvement and upgrading of products and technologies, and point out the direction of perfection.
6. Expert docking. Industry experts participate in the whole process of scientific and technological evaluation, and build a platform for direct communication and cooperation between enterprises and experts through evaluation.
7. Collect resources. Through the accumulation of scientific and technological achievements and the interaction between experts and enterprises, a pragmatic and available library of scientific and technological achievements and expert resources will be formed.
8. Attracting investment. Through the prior evaluation of government-invested projects, we can judge the quality and maturity of projects, identify project risks, improve the efficiency and quality of investment promotion and reduce the risk of decision-making.
9. Recruit talents to attract wisdom. By evaluating the representative scientific and technological achievements of high-level talents to be introduced by the government or enterprises in advance, we can judge the level of talents and provide a basis for the selection and support of talents.
10. End of acceptance. The evaluation report issued by authoritative professional institutions is an important basis for scientifically judging the innovation value and application value of the results, and it is also an important basis for whether the results pass the acceptance and determine the direction of rectification.
Scientific and technological achievements are the core competitiveness of enterprises in innovation activities, and enterprises, especially scientific and technological enterprises, must attach importance to the evaluation of scientific and technological achievements. It is suggested that enterprises entrust qualified, authoritative and influential institutions for evaluation.
Fourth, the evaluation content
(A) technical level evaluation results
(B) the results of the value assessment
(3) Evaluation of application and popularization of achievements
Verb (abbreviation of verb) evaluation index
(a) the degree of technological innovation;
(2) technical maturity;
(3) Technological progress;
(4) Transformation risk;
(5) technical difficulty and complexity;
(6) Economic and social benefits.