Which do you appreciate better, Zhuangzi's aesthetic attitude towards life or Keiko's pragmatic attitude towards life? Love to argue

You mean the article "Zhuangzi and Keiko Traveling on the Haoliang". Keiko is a famous argumentative person. She is more of an inquiring cognitive attitude towards things, lacking appreciation and care in the aesthetic sense, and naturally lacking understanding and recognition of Zhuangzi who is genuinely happy in a free and lively life.

Keiko is a famous argumentative person. She is more of an exploratory cognitive attitude towards things, lacking aesthetics and care.

Zhuangzi thinks that the "happiness" of fish is actually the projection and externalization of his happy mood, which is the concrete proof that he sincerely feels happy in a free and lively life. Zhuangzi pursues "Heaven and earth coexist with me, and all things are one with me", living in harmony with all things and the outside world. He thinks that the "happiness" of fish is actually the projection and externalization of his happy mood. Zhuangzi also advocated "nature" and opposed "man-made". Fish swim freely in the water, which is in line with Zhuangzi's ideal. Therefore, he came to the conclusion that it is natural for fish to be "happy".

It's good to agree with either of them. If you have to choose between two, you can choose to praise Zhuangzi. Being detached from things and returning to the things themselves to enjoy their beauty is a romantic and happy life.

Personally, I appreciate Zhuangzi, because Zhuangzi can enjoy life more and appreciate beauty more.