How to write the exam funding plan?

Examples of reviewing funding schemes are as follows:

Grasping weak subjects: the first subject is comprehensive quality, with a wide scope of investigation and a large proportion of subjective questions, but most of the contents are contacted by students; Subject 2 focuses on educational knowledge, which is highly professional and requires rote learning.

Subject 3 examines subject knowledge and teaching design, so friends should allocate study time according to their own situation and focus on their weak subjects.

Grasp subjectivity: Subjective questions are short answers, analysis, analysis and instructional design questions, with heavy scores and more contents to remember, and the contents of the exam will overlap every year, so it is necessary to pay attention to the scores that can be obtained.

For multiple-choice questions, if everyone's correct rate in real questions can reach more than 80%, then it is very sure, as long as you strengthen the memory of some knowledge points. If the correct rate is between 70% and 80%, you can review and consolidate it selectively.

If the correct rate is below 70%, it is recommended to study it systematically from beginning to end. But no matter how high the correct rate is, we must insist on brushing the questions so as not to forget them, and focus on reviewing the wrong questions.

Short answer, analysis, design and other big questions, I suggest you start memorizing them now, especially those with weak foundation. Because our memory will be forgotten, we must recite the subjective questions at least three times before the exam.

Remember the most important subjective questions in the first round (7 days). In the second round, after remembering the most important subjective questions, you can remember the less important ones (14 days). The third round is also very important and not too important (7 days).