Whether the company re-hires the resigned employees is related to the company's corporate culture and the management style of managers.
Employees of the company, like wives in society, are mostly harmonious and beautiful when they get married, and blame each other when they divorce. In this way, the company is a stranger after the employee leaves the company, and it seems that the employee has fled the sea after leaving the company. In fact, all this has nothing to do with the company and the boss, but with the managers. Because managers are afraid that employees will leave because of work pressure, from communication to guidance, and finally can't stay, it becomes a routine or complaint. Therefore, many company managers have bad feelings about the resigned employees and don't like to continue to use them. They will think that it is a great insult to employees to stay and leave if they want. Secondly, some enterprises pay more attention to the ecology of employees, and constantly introduce new people, which will make enterprises appear prosperous, and at the same time, they can drive the mentality of all employees through the enthusiasm of new people. The introduction of resigned employees may lead to the company falling into the previous state.
At present, there are many opportunities for employees to choose jobs. Due to the pressure of human recruitment, some enterprises like to continue to recruit resigned employees. In the manager's mind, as long as you are willing to come back, we are willing to accept it. In fact, resigned employees are also a great asset of the company. After returning to the company, the resigned employees can quickly become competent and save some training costs for the company. At the same time, employees who leave the company will know more about the company culture, adapt to the company more quickly and maintain stability. Xiao Qiang still likes to use resignees, and thinks that the resignation management of the company is a science.
In a word, whether the company personnel like to recruit employees or not, it is a company behavior, not a social phenomenon.
Struggling Xiao Qiang 20 18 focuses on answering questions in the workplace, and everyone is welcome to pay attention.
The resigned employee continues to work in the original unit because this unit is suitable for him (her) to develop here. For the company, this employee can continue to create value for the unit.
For some units, employees who have left the company don't agree to go back to work. It should be considered that since they have left the company, their previous positions have been replaced by newcomers, and it is normal that they are not allowed to come back. Since you don't cherish it in your post, why care when you come back?
What's more, what suits you and your employer is correct.
As an old bird in the workplace, both companies have encountered it. What is certain is that a company will not make such a choice for no reason, and behind the choice, it must be well thought out. The reasons can probably be divided into the following three types:
First, the difficulty of enterprise recruitment
In some industries, it is difficult to recruit people, but the staff turnover rate is high. Typical is sales and general workers. Employees leave almost every week, so the recruitment pressure faced by enterprises is very great. For this kind of company, the enterprise is very welcome to let the former employees return, because it is more cost-effective for the enterprise to recall the old employees, saving the training cost and adaptation cost.
Second, corporate culture.
Some companies not only don't allow employees to resign, but also don't allow employees to quit and jump ship to competitors. These companies are often large companies, and the welfare benefits are very attractive. Every year, a large number of people sharpen their heads and drill into it. There is no need to worry that the company can't recruit suitable people, and there is no need to eat this grass again. In the cognition of these companies, since you have left, you should be responsible for your actions to the end.
Third, employee behavior.
There is a saying in the workplace that "resignation depends on character". Some people usually work hard, but once they resign, they expose all kinds of mistakes of the company, which has brought great negative influence to the company and even caused substantial losses to the company. This employee-oriented enterprise is very unpopular, because this person's various behaviors prove that he doesn't agree with the company, so why recruit it back?
Rules are dead, people are alive. In fact, many times, this kind of regulation is different. You are very capable and can bring great benefits to the company. Even if the company has an express provision, the company is willing to be lenient. Therefore, we don't have to worry too much about this regulation. How to improve yourself is the real problem to think about.
1. Let's talk about companies that like employees leaving their jobs: this kind of enterprise personnel system is more flexible. Because some employees are in a dispensable state at work, as leaders, there is no better candidate to replace him or her for the time being in line with the principle of coping with use, so there is no choice to dismiss him or her. But when he's gone, it doesn't matter, and he can't come back! If he is really excellent, even if he leaves for special reasons, when he wants to come back, the leader will dismiss the dissatisfied employee and let him come back to work!
2. The personnel system is relatively strict in enterprises that do not allow employees who have left their posts to come back. In other words, you left your job, but you didn't like the company. If you want to come back, it means that you are not doing well outside, so the company stipulates that no matter how capable you are, you are not allowed to come back!
This is what happened to me. After the Spring Festival, one of my colleagues told me that he wanted to leave his job, and he had already made up his mind. I don't need to persuade him. I agreed to quit his job. After more than two months, he suddenly called me and said he wanted to come back, but I refused. ......
This should be related to the performance and personal ability of employees in the previous company. If the company has performed well before and the resignation is handed over properly, most bosses can still accept the resignation of employees. Of course, it does not rule out that some company regulations, such as confidentiality or the company's long-standing system regulations, do not allow employees who have left before, so even if they perform well, the company may not accept it.
The system and culture of each company are different, and whether employees leave their jobs will have different results. Of course, whether the company is willing to accept you depends on your previous reputation. Therefore, any work should be done well. This is responsible for yourself and the company.
Whether the company is willing to let the resigned employees return is mainly related to the boss himself. Both large and small companies generally have a strong "corporate style", which is largely the style of the founders. As far as I know, several companies in real estate industry are obviously different.
BGY, the boss of a real estate development company, is a typical unwelcome employee. Every day, people shout "Welcome employees to go home". A series of re-employment procedures make you collapse when you apply for re-employment. It takes at least half a month for Shenzhen to approve these employees from the immediate supervisor in the area where you left last time, to the regional supervisor, to the regional general manager, the regional human resources department and the group human resources management center. This is normal. If you don't get along with your former boss when you leave your job, there will be a little contradiction, and you will have to go through a lot of trouble to go to public relations and please one by one, so a month has passed. No matter which city, region, branch or affiliated company you are in, this level is essential, which sounds terrible.
Xiao Ou, who works as a property consultant under me, left his job due to family affairs and is going to join in Wenzhou, Zhejiang after half a year. If you find me, you need my help to apply for this job and start the approval process in the BIP system. I gave it to you when the program first appeared in front of me. On the one hand, the young man has done a good job under me, on the other hand, everyone is trying to make a living, so there is no need to embarrass others. However, the process went to the regional executive office and was stuck for half a month. Help Xiaoou ask the reason, that is, the executive general secretary got stuck, saying Xiaoou's performance was not satisfactory before. What the fuck is this logic? People are far away in Wenzhou, Zhejiang, and have no direct business relationship with your application area. Good performance is also a thing of the past, not the present and the future. Besides, did your family eat your meal? I was so angry that I fought for Xiao Ou for a long time and asked him to contact the executive director. Finally, I passed this level and tossed for a month. Just as the process arrived at the Group Human Resource Management Center, there was a formal document: the whole group suspended the reemployment of the resigned personnel. It killed Xiao Ou's way back to BGY, worked for free for a month, and it makes me sick to think about it. But there is nothing you can do. This is the system. This is the rule. If you want to come in, you must abide by the game, or you will be out. There is no slander here, just spit it out, haha.
There is also a real estate agency, Qfang, whose slogan is "gather ordinary people and create brilliant career together", and the company's personnel are very humanized. You come to welcome me and you go to see me off. Moreover, it has left a very good reputation in the industry, especially among the first-line brokers. In the final analysis, it is not easy to get them all to work.
May the world be more harmonious and inclusive.
In fact, this problem has two sides, and we can't just look at the surface. Resignation can be divided into many situations and reasons. For example, employees in a sales industry have excellent sales ability and many resources in the company, and they have not been dismissed or fired by the company. Such people are very welcome to continue working in the company. After all, it will be a big expense for the company to recruit and train new people, which is not in line with the company's interests, so they will welcome such employees back very much. Moreover, if such employees go to other companies, it will be a great loss to the original company, not only the loss of resources, but also the loss of talents. Therefore, many companies will show great welcome to such employees returning to the company.
What kind of people are never employed by the company? That is definitely not in the interests of the company. There is no performance, no performance, no work performance during your tenure. Even if you don't make any contribution to the company's income generation, it is a waste of public resources. Such people, if you are the boss, do you use them?
From the company's point of view, as long as employees can adapt to their jobs and play their role, there is no need to consider strangers. But after all, the company is controlled by people, and people have their own characteristics, and their views on one thing may be just the opposite. In response to what you said, some companies think that people are familiar with each other, and employees leave their jobs and come back, which shows that they have feelings for the old company and are familiar with their jobs, so they welcome employees who leave their jobs to come back. However, some companies believe that employees left the company because they had opinions on the company's behavior. Now they want to come back, which means they are not doing well outside. People with different aspirations can't let him come back, because maybe he will jump ship again at some time, so he is not welcome. If these two decisions do not affect the normal operation of the company, it should be said that there is no problem, and it is impossible to say which is better or worse. Personal opinion, for reference only.