The main reason for losing the case may still be related to the location, not to the incident. At first, Mr. Wang filed a lawsuit with the Xiangfang District People's Court in Harbin, demanding that Tencent delete his personal information, apologize and compensate for the reasonable expenses of rights protection. After the Xiangfang District Court of Harbin accepted the case, it ruled that Tencent immediately stopped infringing on the plaintiff's privacy right. Subsequently, Tencent filed an application for jurisdiction objection and transferred the case to Shenzhen Nanshan District Court for trial, and then the case was transferred to Shenzhen Nanshan Court. According to Article 1032 of the Civil Code, natural persons have the right to privacy, and no organization or individual may infringe upon others' right to privacy by spying, exposing or making public. Privacy is the private life of a natural person, a quiet and private space, private activities and private information that others don't want to know. So the key to this case is personal information, is it personal information? According to the court's ruling, personal information is not entirely private information. The court may think that the attention of WeChat friends is not important to users, and even if it is leaked, it may not have a great impact on users.
The possible outcome of this case is legally ambiguous in many aspects related to the Internet. Especially in terms of personal privacy, it is very convenient for many softwares to obtain personal privacy, because they control a large amount of personal information, as long as the data is transferred out. In fact, before users use this software, there will be a user notice, but many users will not really read it, and there are many details, such as obtaining your personal information. This gives these companies an excuse to touch everyone's personal privacy to a certain extent, which is very unsafe. Therefore, if this case is paid enough attention, it may promote the improvement of relevant laws and regulations.
Protect your privacy. For example, many softwares have the right to request the contact information in the address book, and then find each other in the software through big data. The premise is to get my consent, but many people don't care about this requirement. Sometimes you can choose to refuse in this case.