Up to now, the word "limit" in Heze, Hengyang, Guangzhou, Hangzhou, Taiyuan, Lanzhou and Hefei has been loosened to varying degrees.
On the morning of February 2 1, important information came from the property market. Some media called the staff of Fuyang Land and Resources Bureau. The staff admitted that Fuyang has officially cancelled the price limit, becoming the first city to cancel the price limit since 20 19, and successfully joined the big team with the loose word "limit".
It can be seen that before June, 2065438+June, 2008+June, 2065438 +2008 10, the residential documents in Fuyang, Anhui Province marked a familiar clause: "After the bidder wins the land, the average sales price of the developed commercial housing shall not be higher than the average monthly sales price of the commercial housing in the same region, the same category and the same quality, that is,
But by February of 20 19, this clause had been deleted in 20 19.
If Fuyang is in a low-key process to cancel the price limit (after all, the official of Fuyang Land and Resources Bureau can still find the relevant announcement documents), then some cities cancel the price limit completely silently, such as Nanjing.
Recently, some buyers broke the news that some sectors in Nanjing have already exceeded the price limit. The reporter said that the cancellation of the price limit for some properties in Nanjing has long been a well-known thing in the local area. When the news came out, the market was in an uproar. 20 19 will Nanjing, once the "land king" city, make a comeback?
In fact, whether to cancel the price limit or not is a "tentative" loosening in the public's cognition. It is no accident that so many cities began to join the ranks of canceling price limits and restricting sales.
So the crux of the problem is, why do so many cities follow suit and cancel the word "limit"?
First of all, from a macro point of view, whether it is to cancel the price limit or to restrict the sale, it is in line with the basic policies put forward by the state, such as "taking measures according to the city", "stabilizing land prices, housing prices and expectations".
Refining to specific cities, canceling the price limit or restricting sales may be the result of comprehensive consideration of each city. The regulation of housing prices is not a single regulation. If the house price rises too much before, it is necessary to curb the house price, and if the house price falls sharply, it is necessary to stabilize the house price.
Prior to this, the reason why so many cities have to implement various "restrictions" such as price limit, purchase restriction and sales restriction is essentially because of the large demand for public housing.
However, with the tightening of various regulatory policies at the top level, especially since the top level set the tone of "staying in houses without speculation" and "resolutely curbing the rise in housing prices", the land market has shown an obvious cooling trend, and the phenomenon of land auction in many cities has begun to soar.
In addition, there is another particularly important factor. That's fiscal revenue. As we all know, most cities in China rely on land transfer for a large part of their financial resources. If the land cannot be sold or sold at a good price for a long time, the government will have no more funds to improve the local infrastructure.
So do developers. Government land has been "frozen" for too long, so developers dare not take the initiative to take the land. At the same time, as a real estate developer, if there is not enough land reserve, developers will be scared. Therefore, when the property market is "frozen" for a period of time, the policy is slightly "loosened", which can be said to be the same demand of local governments and developers.
The two "land kings" cities that quietly canceled the price limit have more or less satisfied the above points:
Let me talk about Fuyang first. According to the statistics of Fuyang last year, Fuyang's fiscal revenue was 32.48 billion yuan, of which the urban land revenue was 20/kloc-0.20 billion yuan, accounting for about 62% of the total fiscal revenue! A large part of fiscal revenue depends on land revenue.
Since the second half of last year, the land market in Fuyang has been depressed, and many plots have been auctioned. The government has taken various measures to stimulate the market to recover, but the effect is not obvious.
According to public information, since June last year, land transactions in Fuyang have already experienced waterloo:
On June 20th, Fuyang Civic Center auctioned plots 20 17-32 and 20 17-55, and another plot was changed from auction to listing. On June 28th, Fuyang ushered in the last land auction in June. Four plots, including 20 17- 1, 20 17-2 1 and 20 17-22, were auctioned in public, and all three plots were auctioned off because of insufficient bidders.
On the one hand, most of the fiscal revenue depends on the income from land sales; on the other hand, the land auction continues to fail. Therefore, it is completely natural for Fuyang to "cancel the price limit" this year. Only when the government has money can it support more urban construction.
Another quietly loosening the price limit is Nanjing. According to the statistics of some media people, up to now, six sectors in Nanjing have fallen.
Source: Bearded House
In contrast, there are several interesting places to cancel the price limit in Nanjing: 1, which is to cancel the price limit of some buildings; The official didn't make a statement.
This may be related to the current environment. When Hengyang clearly "canceled the price limit", the official withdrew the documents under the pressure of public opinion, even in Hengyang, a third-and fourth-tier city, not to mention Nanjing, a second-tier city.
What is certain is that in the future, this regulation mode of "keeping promises" will become the basic form of "micro-relaxation" in cities all over the country, and more cities will follow suit in the future.
So why did Nanjing quietly cancel the price limit? Is it also the result of being kidnapped by "land finance"?
Honestly, it's not. Although the land price in some urban areas of Nanjing dropped sharply last year, the local auction market also gave people a feeling of cooling down, but compared with other strong second-tier cities, Nanjing has nothing particularly outstanding.
Moreover, there is an interesting phenomenon. Among all the strong second-tier cities, Nanjing's dependence on real estate (the proportion of real estate investment in the total GDP) is very low, and only one Tianjin is lower than Nanjing, so it is obviously unreasonable to say that Nanjing has also been kidnapped by "land finance".
The reason why Nanjing wants to quietly cancel the price limit of some properties this time is very likely related to the consumer rights protection in Nanjing before. In July last year, the largest owner's rights protection broke out in Nanjing.
This time, the "cancellation of price limit" for some real estates is of great significance to stop the tide of rights protection. In the past, in the case of comprehensive price limit, some developers made "double contracts" (one for house purchase and one for renovation contract, from which developers earned the difference) or cut corners on house construction in order to save the cost of building, so it was naturally the buyers who suffered.
When it came out, the impact was extremely bad, but after things appeared, the problem had to be solved. At this time, Nanjing imposed a price limit on some properties, which is of great significance to repairing the tide of rights protection.