1. 1 Strengthen the quality of decision makers and participants. In the past, administrative decision-making was only a matter for one or several leaders in the government. With the complexity of administrative decision-making environment, decision makers are also expanding. As the embodiment of subjective ability of decision-making system, its quality is the key to the quality and efficiency of decision-making. Therefore, in order to realize the scientific decision-making of the government and improve the efficiency of administrative decision-making, we must cultivate and bring up a group of high-quality administrative decision-making subjects who are politically qualified, professionally competent, principled, energetic and innovative.
Therefore, this requires decision makers to consciously learn to attach importance to, persist in and be good at learning, and master scientific decision-making theories and methods in learning. In addition, in the process of selecting talents, the government should always adhere to the principle of "fair competition and merit-based employment" and attract high-quality talents to the decision-making departments, which can not only ensure the consistency of personnel flow in the decision-making departments, but also ensure the high quality of decision-making subjects.
1.2 The extent to which scientific decision-making is realized by following scientific decision-making procedures and using decision-making methods reasonably depends to a great extent on the rational use of government decision-making procedures and methods. In a sense, doing things according to procedures means doing things according to law. Without scientific decision-making procedure, it is difficult to form scientific decision-making and scientific decision-making procedure, which is an important symbol and development of modern scientific decision-making system. The first is to find the problem and determine the goal. Second, mutual exclusion, which is convenient to choose. The selection stage is the stage of comprehensive evaluation and selection of various schemes. Finally, analyze and evaluate, and choose the best scheme.
1.3 increase the allocation of decision-making funds and facilities, realize the scientificity of government decision-making, and then improve the efficiency of decision-making, we must ensure the required funds and facilities. When making decision-making rules, in addition to office and scientific research funds, we should also increase the investment in decision-making funds. Party and government newspapers and periodicals should formulate supporting policies, reduce related expenses and increase financial support for the disclosure of relevant decision-making information. At the same time, administrative decision-making technical services, especially information network services, need to be further improved. On the one hand, internal work needs an open information system to speed up the efficiency of administrative work; On the other hand, foreign work also needs technical upgrading to facilitate the public to access information and establish direct contact with decision-making organs.
2. Strengthen the system construction of government decision-making.
2. 1 Establish a fair and democratic public participation system and attach importance to social conditions and public opinion. According to the concept of modern democracy, the power of the government comes from the authorization of the people, and the government should exercise power on behalf of the people. Only by allowing the people to fully participate in the management of the government and exert influence on the administrative decision-making of the government can we ensure that the government truly represents public opinion.
2.2 The establishment of decision-making advisory bodies to give full play to the advantages of experts and scholars Expert advisory bodies and think tanks are an important part of modern decision-making mechanisms and a prerequisite for scientific decision-making. In the preliminary work, provide sufficient background information for expert consultation, ensure that experts have sufficient time to conduct research, and form an effective mechanism to avoid the situation of expert consultation going through the motions. On the source of experts, we should innovate in the system and mechanism, learn from the employment mechanism abroad, implement the government employee system for some experts in conventional fields, and hire some technical talents with high salaries to provide full-time services for government departments, which can not only cultivate the decision-making experience and ability of these experts, but also facilitate the government departments to get technical support at any time; In addition to strengthening communication with all walks of life, experts should also expand their contacts with academic institutions, consulting associations and other platforms; While relying on authoritative experts, strengthen cooperation with young and middle-aged experts, make full use of the basic platform of expert database, select some senior experts to provide consulting services for administrative decision-making, and realize the sharing of consulting experts resources in the province. We should pay attention to the optimization of expert structure, set up different consultation forms according to the nature and category of decision-making, pay attention to the balance and optimization of expert structure, and comprehensively consider the technical influence of different fields.
2.3 the implementation of information disclosure system, increase the transparency of decision-making, realize the disclosure of government decision-making information, and truly give people the right to know, which is not only conducive to the government's scientific decision-making, but also meets the requirements of building a harmonious society. To build a harmonious society, we should not only pay attention to the harmony of results, but also pay attention to the harmony of means and processes, in other words, we should resolve contradictions in time, so that the government and the public are often in a benign interactive situation. Through the publicity of decision-making information, the government's decision-making information can be quickly, conveniently, cheaply and accurately transmitted to the public, which can reduce the economic and time costs that the public needs to pay for obtaining this information, realize two-way and direct communication and interaction between the government and the public, and keep close contact with the public. Only with extensive public participation can we have more and greater right to speak, and the right to speak and the right to know complement each other. Only by fully understanding the situation can we be targeted, stimulate the enthusiasm and creative spirit of the masses better, and then provide more valuable reference opinions and suggestions for the government's scientific decision-making.
3. Improve the legal guarantee of government decision-making.
3. 1 Establish an effective legal supervision mechanism for government decision-making. In order to prevent the adverse consequences and mistakes of government decision-making, improve decision-making efficiency and reduce decision-making mistakes, it is necessary to establish a democratic, open and effective political decision-making supervision mechanism. The core of establishing the government decision-making supervision mechanism is to carry out strong democratic supervision on the administrative decision-making subject, so that its decision-making authority can be implemented under democratic and scientific management, power and responsibility can be organically combined, and the sense of responsibility can be enhanced. Judging from the current decision-making of our government, one is to establish a complete decision-making supervision mechanism, such as the system of making government affairs public, the system of briefing, and the system of supervision and inspection. Supervise whether the leaders of administrative decision-making are authorized by law and make procedural decisions, and track and supervise major issues. The second is to standardize the administrative decision-making power and responsibility of administrative decision-making leaders. Collective discussion should be conducted in strict accordance with procedures and principles to prevent a few people from handling major issues beyond their authority and let a few people have the final say; The person in charge of the division of labor should have clear responsibilities and authority, and the responsibility should be implemented to people. Don't "grab your eyebrows and beard", don't discuss everything collectively, and don't engage in formal collective leadership. In fact, no one is responsible.
3.2 Standardizing post-decision evaluation and accountability post-decision evaluation and accountability mechanism is a weak link in administrative decision-making, which needs to be valued and improved. Decision evaluation system can make the government and society have a comprehensive grasp and understanding of the effectiveness of government decision-making, help to test the ability and level of decision-makers, strengthen the sense of responsibility and mission of decision-makers, and provide scientific basis for investigating the responsibility of decision-makers. Therefore, people's congresses and governments at all levels should attach great importance to decision-making evaluation and formulate a decision-making evaluation system to ensure that major decisions must be evaluated accurately and timely. First, establish scientific evaluation criteria. Adhere to the principle of goal orientation, whether the decision is correct and whether the implementation is effective, and make judgments according to the results of decision implementation to prevent the bad tendency of focusing only on form and exaggerating achievements. Adhere to the principle of comprehensive analysis, make a concrete analysis of the implementation effect, comprehensively consider scientific rationality, coordination and operability, and make overall consideration from the aspects of the ability and quality, authority, objective environmental resources, social group identity and so on. Adhere to the principle of standardization, design different evaluation index systems according to different categories, and form scientific and fair decision-making evaluation conclusions. Secondly, improve the evaluation institutions. Due to subjective factors, decision makers or implementers often can't evaluate comprehensively and objectively. There must be a special organization to track the implementation of decisions and make evaluation conclusions. Considering the introduction of a third-party evaluation mechanism is conducive to the integrity, scientificity and objectivity of the evaluation system. Efforts should be made to make the government's decision-making process implement the legal thought of "laws to follow, laws to be observed, and violations of laws to be prosecuted", and truly "whoever makes decisions will be responsible".
To sum up, to improve and develop leaders' accountability for government decision-making mistakes, we should not only enhance leaders' sense of responsibility, but also speed up the construction of laws and regulations, standardize the operational level and improve relevant supporting systems. The true sense of accountability comes not only from the hard rules of the system, but also from the soft pressure of the people and public opinion, and more from the moral consciousness of the leaders themselves and the deeper political atmosphere. I believe that with the acceleration of China's political system reform, the continuous improvement of relevant laws and systems, and the general improvement of public legal awareness, the formulation of leadership responsibility for government decision-making mistakes will be effectively implemented, so as to finally realize the scientific decision-making of government affairs.