Wealth and wealth are good luck, and people and wealth have spring. Is this couplet neat?

This couplet is not neat, and the specific analysis is as follows: Although this couplet is flat and harmonious: flat and flat, flat and flat, and the meaning of the couplet is also very clear, which meets the requirements of the couplet, the part of speech and grammatical structure of the couplet in the same position are not completely consistent. "Wealth-human wealth", with the same grammatical structure, is a joint phrase, which conforms to the legal provisions and has disharmony in parts of speech. Wealth is an adjective, while human wealth is a noun with different parts of speech. The part of speech and grammatical structure of "both complete and prosperous" meet the requirements of joint law; The part of speech and grammatical structure of "good luck-following spring" do not meet the requirements of conjunctions. "Good" is an adjective and "Follow" is a preposition, which is not right. "Lucky" and "Spring" are nouns, but yes, "Lucky" is a radical phrase, and "Following Spring" is not. "Lai" and "Zhi" are verbs, which meet the requirements of conjunctions.