Judicial determination of education and training contract fraud?

In practice, some education and training institutions have the objective of enrolling students and signing training contracts with consumers subjectively, and objectively fabricate facts to make consumers express mistakes and set up education and training contracts. Can their behavior be regarded as fraud?

Trial rules of legal letters

1. The person in charge of an education and training institution publishes false information for the purpose of recruiting students, which is enough to make the parties trust and make them express mistakes, and establish an education and training contract relationship, which constitutes fraud-Wang v. Cai and other education and training contract disputes.

Case summary: For the purpose of attracting students, the person in charge of an education and training institution publishes false information about the education scale, teaching staff and training achievements of the education and training institution on the social platform, and informs the parties about the false information of their children in the education and training institution when chatting on WeChat, which will make the parties feel trust and make them express mistakes.

If the fraudster requests to exercise the right to terminate the education and training contract, the people's court shall support it.

Case number: (2020) ten thousand18152

Trial: Hefei Intermediate People's Court, Anhui Province

material

If you have any questions about the self-taught/adult-taught examination, don't know the contents of the test sites for self-taught/adult-taught examination, and don't know the local policies for self-taught/adult-taught examination, click on Mr. official website at the bottom to get the review materials for free: /xl/