Ancient people knew something. How bad is it? Yes, those who thought there was something from the beginning. Easy, easy to do, not easy to add! Secondly, I thought there was something, but there was a seal before it started. Secondly, I think there is a seal, but there is right or wrong before the start. Right and wrong are clear, and the Tao is lost. The loss of Tao is the achievement of love. What about success and failure? Nothing, you lose! Gain and loss, so Zhao's guqin is also; Nothing is lost, and the Zhao family does not play drums. Zhao Wen's guqin, Shi Kuang's strategy, Keiko's foundation, and the third son's knowledge are similar? Are prosperous times, so in the last year. Only its goodness is different from another; It's also good. I want to make it clear. He is not clear, so he is hard and ignorant. His son, on the other hand, ended up with a literary talent and nothing for life. If so, it can be said that it can be achieved, although I can also achieve it. If it doesn't work out, it's none of my business. It is the honor of being suspicious, and it is also the plan of a saint. It is called "make it clear" because it is unnecessary and contains all kinds of mediocrity.
Now there are words here, I wonder if they are similar? Isn't it the same? Class and non-class, that is, class, is no different. Although, please have a taste: there is a beginning and an end, a beginning and an end, and a husband without a beginning and an end; Some people have it, some people have it, some people have it before, some people have it before. Russia has nothing, nothing unknown. Today, I have a statement, but I don't know what I call the result. The result is meaningless?
Husband, the world is no bigger than the end of Qiu Hao, and Mount Tai is small; Moshou died, but Peng Zu died. Heaven and earth are born with me, and everything is one with me. Since it is one, what's the point? Now it's one of them, is it speechless? One plus one equals two, two plus one equals three. From then on, Li Qiao can't get it anymore, but the situation is so ordinary! So there is no suitable situation, so that third, the situation is suitable. Nothing to do!
Because it is already, there is a seal before the beginning of the husband's Tao, and there are often words before the beginning. To exist, there is a cup. Please describe it: there are left and right, ethics and justice, division and debate, competition and contention. This is called bade. Outside Liuhe, saints exist no matter what; Within Liuhe, the sage told it; During the Spring and Autumn Period, saints discussed the ambitions of kings but did not argue.
Therefore, those who are divided have no points; Those who argue, some don't argue. He said, "Why?" "The sage is pregnant with it, and everyone argues with it." Therefore, people who argue will not see it. The husband's way is not called, the argument is not spoken, the benevolence is ruthless, the sincerity is not embarrassed, and the courage is not embarrassed. It's better to talk than to argue. Benevolence often fails, sincerity does not believe and courage does not succeed. How many directions do five circles have? It's too late to know what you don't know. Who knows the argument without words and the way without words? If you can know, this is called abundance. Pay attention to what is unsatisfactory, consider what is inexhaustible, and don't know its source. This is called Bao Guang.
? interpret
In ancient times, there was a saint whose knowledge of the universe reached a certain level. Why extreme? Because he realized that some things were nothing. This kind of cognition has reached its peak and is extremely poor in the wisdom of the world. No one can surpass it A lesser person thinks there is something, but it is nameless. The worst people think there is something famous, but there is no right or wrong. The appearance of right and wrong leads to the decline of Tao, and the decline of Tao leads to loss. The decline of Tao breeds love and hate, and love and hate are born together. However, is this enough to prove real success and failure? There is no such thing as success or failure! What is real success? Why is it a real loss? The achievement in people's eyes is nothing more than playing the piano well; The loss in people's eyes is nothing more than the lack of superhuman piano skills like Zhao Wen. Talented pianists such as Zhao Wen have a good voice; A generation of masters, such as Shi Kuang, have vivid music; A person who knows how to distinguish, like Hui Shi, enjoys a good reputation in all directions. But what are the talents of these three people? But they were really people who were in their prime and enjoyed a lifetime reputation. I won't say anything else. As for Keiko, he is just addicted to knowledge and always wants to be unconventional. What you believe is always imposed on others. In fact, he didn't really understand, otherwise he wouldn't have been around this difficult paradox until he died. His son inherited his father's career, but he has been spinning around at the starting point and accomplished nothing for life. If this can also be called success, then am I not successful? But if all this is not success, then I'm afraid there is really nothing in this world that can be called success. Therefore, the sage is not pursuing the grandstanding talents of the above three, but the great wisdom and wisdom of thoroughly understanding and pointing out the maze. But the world is too drunk to understand the holy way, so it abandons the holy and confuses the real and the false. I wrote it here to warn future generations.
I'm going to discuss a problem related to the philosophical foundation now. I wonder if it is similar to the views of ancient sages or different? If similar views are similar, then he and I belong to the same category. Whether it is similar or not, I will try to explain it for the time being. Let's talk about the concept of beginning: where there is a beginning, there is a beginning, and there is a beginning before the beginning, so that you can go back indefinitely. So, no beginning? Let's start with the concept of nothingness: there is nothingness, there is nothingness, there is nothing before, and there is nothing before. This is also a process that can be traced back indefinitely. So, there is nothing? This can shake all philosophical foundations! Now we memorize yes and no, I really don't know if this is true or not. I can only take this as true for the time being, but I really don't know if I'm doing it right. Still wrong?
If we look at the world from Murray's eyes, the whole world is just as small as a hair, and Mount Tai can't be called big. God's life span is a short-lived baby at best, and Peng Zu is naturally not long-lived. Heaven and earth and I both come from Moro, and everything is shared with me. Note that here we are deducing the beginning of the birth of the universe, not describing today's heaven, earth, me and everything! Then, since we have the concept of unity, shouldn't we also have language? Now that you have a name, how can you have no language? Furthermore, language is different from one, so both one and language produce two. In addition, the number one and the number two produce the number three. According to this logic, first, the repeated superposition of language and numbers will produce endless concepts like snowballing. This is undoubtedly a digital explosion, and I am afraid that even the super calendar masters can't cope with it, let alone ordinary people. We have made room for three people from scratch, so how much space will we make from scratch? It's unimaginable!
Because of this, the Tao has no beginning, and the language can last forever without beginning. Since there is a language, there is bound to be a semantic distinction. Here I try to classify semantics. Language can be divided into eight categories according to its functions: naming titles, guiding words and deeds, standardizing ethics, stating righteousness, distinguishing things, distinguishing right from wrong, enhancing cognition and gaining knowledge. This can be regarded as the eight functions of language. Outside the universe, saints believe in it but don't explore it. Heaven and earth, universe, saints explore but don't say right or wrong. After the righteousness of the country, the dynasty changed, and the saints competed, not with others.
Some differences between things need to be treated differently, and some should not be treated differently. Right and wrong compete, they are born perfect, different people have different views, there is no need to pester them at all. "Why?" "Saints don't treat dissidents as animals and treat them equally. Ordinary people always feel that dissidents are a big violation. " Therefore, the speaker seems to be missing something-not missing, but seeing it in reason rather than words. In short, the Tao does not cut itself, there is no need to argue, benevolent people have different opinions, wise people have different opinions, honesty is neither humble nor supercilious, and courage does not need to be brave. If Tao is boastful, it is not Tao; if words are praised or praised, it is biased; if benevolence is applied everywhere, it is not Tao; if sincerity is excessive, it is Tao; if courage is rash, it is invincible. If these five essentials can be used properly and perfected, all kinds of recipes can be regarded as tips. A person's most valuable thing is self-knowledge, and he can only be called a confidant if he can't stop. Who can really understand the self-evident eloquence and the unexplainable road? If this is the case, then his wisdom will inevitably be like "abundance": the rivers and seas are full of attention, but they cannot be exhausted, and they cannot be exhausted, and they cannot seek their roots. This eternal and endless light of wisdom is called Bao Guang.