In addition, I personally think that it is the expectation of making money that will care about welfare benefits. Instead, I will obey the arrangement and accept instructions at work. People who experience life, let alone execution, are estimated to be able to go to work normally without causing trouble. From Q user: user 6692987
Personally, I think there is no problem with the salary increase, but when it comes to this issue, I believe the questioner must want to know how we, as a role that needs talents, can embarrass both sides because of this issue. So, as an interviewer, how can you listen to the other person's behavior like this? I was really uncomfortable with this interviewer before, but when I agreed to the other side's conditions and asked him to come to work, I found that he was very enthusiastic about my work, and he could guarantee the completion of the task every day, knowing how to cooperate and communicate, which surprised me! I thought I was doing business at a loss, but his daily work made me feel very profitable. I need such employees who know what they need, put themselves in the company's shoes, think about what they need and do it. He makes me feel valuable and a good employee. I am willing to spend ten interview hours to meet such employees. So after that, I changed my interview method. I am willing to raise my salary. Will not stop me from recruiting the talents I need because of the average salary in a city! All those who work hard, those who are willing to pay and those who are willing to think should be rewarded. Now is not the time to squeeze the labor force, and it is no longer feasible. Now should belong to an era of developing workers. It is our responsibility as a personnel manager to give them new missions, new tasks and new treatment. Recruiting a person is far more important to a company than saving unnecessary money for the company! I need talents, ambitious but capable talents! From Q user: user 3790970