Is the Battle of the Year of the Beast good?

Nian Beast was originally the representative animal of China's Chinese New Year culture, but Battle of Nian Beast didn't really combine China's cultural background with animation like Kung Fu Panda, but only regarded it as a dispensable stunt. The young plot left behind made the film neither shape a good world outlook nor talk about even the burden in the exquisite picture, so the whole film was in a dead atmosphere from beginning to end. Only Michael Chen, a villain with voice, can win a laugh or two, but this stalk obviously can't win the joy of children who don't understand this stalk. What's even more incredible is that the values conveyed by the film are full of criticism among children from poor families. What does this movie tell the audience about values? It is not only a confession of the proposition that "happiness from the heart is more important than happiness from the outside", but that what is discovered should not be returned to its original owner. Children of rich families should be praised by stars at school and become well-deserved kings of children. The rich who make a fortune by selling happiness agents by hook or by crook need not be punished. These are not helpful to children, but will be misled by their values, which is far more annoying and harmful than mediocre interpretation. At the same time, these values have further influenced the development of the plot, making the film unable to win, making the film unable to win the joy of children and the recognition of adults. Animated movies never rely on superficial whitewashing, but on a story that can touch people's feelings and be unconstrained, just like a collection of light and shadow, and it is by no means a mediocre work with three incorrect views and empty shelves, but it is full of words.