Will CBA not allow tactical fouls in the future? Will there be no tactical fouls in future FIBA matches?
Zhao Jiwei was found guilty of a foul, which was in line with "clause C 1".
The second round of Xinjiang-Liaoning match ended and the situation changed suddenly. The Xinjiang team, which was four points behind, arranged for Adams to hit three points. Zhao Jiwei pushed the cover and reached for a foul, trying to get Adams to punish 2 points, and Liaoning got the ball. At first, the central referee said that the three points were valid, but after watching the video, the referee fined Zhao Jiwei for a foul, and the Xinjiang team made a penalty of 1.
I sent this Weibo after Tencent live broadcast-
Although fans have all kinds of discussions about this penalty, some say that the referee will help the Xinjiang team, and some say that it will benefit Liaoning ... but in the end, they focus on "tactical foul" because the so-called "FIBA new rules" are not known to most people. What they don't understand is that after watching basketball for so many years, tactical foul is a part of the basketball game and an important means for the backward side to chase points. How can you say it's gone
In fact, I sent a Weibo this summer-
At that time, the "selling point" was that FIBA relaxed the restriction of layup rhythm, and no one could predict what kind of results would be produced by the tightening of illegal fouls. At that time, when discussing the tightening of illegal fouls with an international referee, I asked about tactical fouls. I also had the same question: Will FIBA not allow tactical fouls that are not aimed at the ball in the future? I didn't get the exact answer, and I dare not write it in Weibo.
After the matches in Liaoning and Xinjiang, this scene appeared again in the last 2 minutes of the third round match between Beijing and Shandong. Ty lawson of Shandong team fouled the team like this. In this defense, Lawson seemed to get the ball, but he was also fouled for excessive action-
Lawson was found guilty of a foul on his opponent, which was in line with "C 1 clause, C2 and C3".
In order to help myself and the fans better understand the new rules of FIBA, I specially consulted an international referee in CBA and asked him to answer some questions.
He said that FIBA will make some adjustments to the rules and the spirit of the rules every year to ensure the appreciation and fluency of basketball games. Emphasize that blowing and punishing violations is only part of this year's new regulations. In September this year, chinese basketball association held a referee training class in Beilun, Ningbo, and specially made the rule adjustment part into PPT for everyone to learn. All PPT are translated from English into Chinese according to FIBA's documents released to the world, which represents FIBA's rules and is the first meaning FIBA wants to convey.
There are five categories of violations-
For Zhao Jiwei and Lawson's violations, the international referee thinks there is no problem. He explained: "According to the spirit of the new rules, these two (fouls) should be sentenced like this. According to the spirit of the original rules, it can also be judged in this way, because it conforms to' C1clause' (illegally trying to grab the ball directly within the spirit and intention of the rules). Liaoning's foul on Xinjiang is in line with' C1clause', not' C3 clause', and it is not in the transition of attack and defense. Lawson fouled the opponent's master. According to the previous rules, it was also a rude action and must be judged by the body. According to the spirit of the new rules, if there is such an action in the last 2 minutes, it is even more important to judge. "
Then the international referee told me several cases about "C 1 clause" in PPT released by chinese basketball association (limited to space, only two cases are posted below). He particularly emphasized the penalty for several fouls in the last two minutes of the game. CBA should carry out FIBA spirit and unite the whole game.
Then the problem is coming. Liaoning team thinks Zhao Jiwei is a tactical foul. Is tactical foul not allowed in the future? Many fans have expressed doubts: after watching the ball for many years, they all know that tactical fouls are part of the basketball game. Without tactical foul, there would be no exciting last minute, and it would be impossible to create the miracle of McGrady's 35 seconds 13 points; At the last critical moment, fans can expect that the backward team will make a tactical foul, the leading team knows that the opponent will make a tactical foul, and the referee can also predict that there will be a tactical foul. How to prohibit tactical foul?
The international referee said: "FIBA did not say that tactical fouls are not allowed, but if this action is to be unified throughout the game, it will be judged as a foul." If this action does not violate the body in the first 38 minutes, then it is not an infringement. "
He stressed that there is no such thing as "no tactical foul" in the rules of FIBA. "But according to the spirit of FIBA, C 1 C5, which are against the body, should be strictly implemented, and any one should be sentenced to be against the body. You can perform this tactic, but it must be based on actively grabbing the ball, "he said." "In other words, negative tactical fouls will disappear."
In fact, my biggest doubt is, if one side commits a tactical foul, instead of rushing to the ball, the action is not big, but patting the other side on the shoulder or gently pulling the arm, how should this be judged, and is it not allowed in the future?
International referees are also embarrassed. He said he didn't represent the referee committee of the league company. He said, "CBA league companies require strict implementation of FIBA spirit. Now that we have advanced and talked with the sports team, we will implement it according to this. Judging from the recent rounds of implementation, sports teams still accept the spirit conveyed before. Everyone is actively restraining their movements. At the last two minutes, even if a team wants to grab time, it is still trying to grab the ball. Since everyone understands and implements this in the implementation process, there is no need for us to go back. "
But he expressed his personal views on "tactical foul" to me: "After all, I haven't seen it in the official FIBA competition. Considering that the league is different from the tournament system and has its own characteristics, especially when the home audience thinks that their team has a chance to equalize the score at a specific time and score, they may take tactical fouls to stop the time and reserve overtaking opportunities. Therefore, I think that as long as the unification is implemented this season, the referee should retain the power to judge according to the action. If the foul action is average, give a general foul. If the behavior constitutes a violation, it is still necessary to violate the rules. "
In fact, the new rules of FIBA were implemented in June 10, and there were no major international competitions during this period, which can be used as a reference. The international referee said: "We are also looking forward to seeing how they will implement this document in the FIBA competition in the next CBA window. Therefore, in the final stage of this season, when one side still has a chance to overtake, if tactical foul is adopted, it may still depend on the action on the field. If it is a general foul, it will still be a general foul. If it constitutes a violation, it still needs to be blown. "
He said that so far, no general manager or head coach of the club has consulted the league company about tactical foul. "Everyone accepts an opinion," he said. "Even if I want to make a foul, I want to make a foul in the process of grabbing the ball to achieve this tactic, instead of directly rushing people."
Both Ding Yanyuhang and Jennings were found to have violated the rules of defensive tactics, in line with the "C3 clause".
Then let's wait for the World Cup qualifiers, because this is a match that FIBA directly sends referees to blow off, and the execution of the last two minutes is actually the official standard of FIBA. Then my question comes again: on the one hand, FIBA issues documents for the World Basketball Association to implement, on the other hand, it asks everyone to give feedback and ask questions. Do they think this new rule is immature?
If FIBA issues a document asking everyone to strictly implement it, and if you go to the World Cup qualifiers, or your nephew plays lanterns-as usual, that is to say, our punishment for league tactical fouls may be too strict. What should CBA do next?
The international referee said, "We can get together again next season. The same is true of FIBA. When new problems appear in the implementation process, they will be adjusted in the next cycle. FIBA has a guiding opinion, which has been implemented, but there will be new problems in the process of implementation. After these questions are fed back, FIBA will definitely explain the rules or modify some places.
"Judging from the text conveyed by FIBA at present, the penalty is the same if the audience is required to watch only the movements. In this sense, we should put an end to this kind of foul in the future, especially when the lagging party asks for a stop time to keep the overtaking opportunity.
"However, although the rules tell us that in order to stop time, you should rush to the people at the last time instead of the ball, and the whole audience must be consistent. However, in the process of implementation, there will definitely be some new problems, such as whether you directly killed my chance of overtaking by judging the slight contact. Therefore, I believe that after some feedback, FIBA will explain some rules. "
The new rules of FIBA released the restriction of the center foot during the March, and Ding Yanyu's layup is no longer a violation of the position.
It is usually complicated and difficult to explain the rules of basketball, but if you want to know about the game and the latest changes in some basic rules and rules, you can at least stop booing.
Many of our fans watch more NBA games and know less about CBA games. In fact, these are two professional leagues with completely different rules. CBA is based on FIBA rules, and NBA rules are constantly developing. From the general trend, FIBA's rules are moving closer to the NBA, but there are still many rules different from the NBA.
For example, the international referee explained to me why the match between FIBA and CBA will not "cut sharks" like the NBA:
"According to the spirit of FIBA rules, as a defensive side, we must actively go to steals the ball, with the purpose of fighting for the ball right or defending players to break through with the ball. The defense of a player without the ball is to prevent him from catching the ball or stealing it when the ball is about to reach him. But if the ball doesn't reach him at all, and he is in the no-ball zone, you want to stop time and let him make a free throw. According to the spirit of FIBA's rules, even if your action may be slight, you should directly punish him for violating your body. Therefore, there will be no' shark cutting' in the competition between FIBA and CBA. "
In this rule, CBA obviously advocates defending the competition for the ball and puts the game first, while NBA has been reluctant to limit "shark cutting", which is also considered to be dramatic and helpful to generate hype.
Perhaps this is the fundamental difference between FIBA and NBA.