First of all, in Mr. Zhao's rental case, although Mr. Zhao is the breaching party, Mr. Zhao's attitude has always been very good. Mr. Zhao signed a two-year lease contract with the landlord, but due to his own reasons, the house was not renewed in 10, and his rental deposit could not be returned in case of breach of contract. Mr. Zhao did not ask for a deposit, but informed the landlord in advance to terminate the lease contract in advance.
However, the landlord thought that Mr. Zhao had breached the contract, so he rented the house to others without authorization. Mr. Zhao rented this house to sit in the office and decorated it, which was a mess. The landlord's practice obviously involves illegal destruction of other people's property. At the same time, when Mr. Zhao was still renting a house, Mr. Zhao just told the landlord that he would not rent it in 10, but it was still in September and the right to use the house was still in Mr. Zhao's hand. As a result, the landlord rented the house again without authorization on the grounds of Mr. Zhao's breach of contract, which was the second illegal act.
Finally, it is obvious that the landlord himself is the dominant party, but because of his illegal behavior, he changed from a victim to an offender, and the landlord's behavior has been illegal, so Mr. Zhao Can sued the landlord and asked the landlord to compensate him for all his losses reasonably and legally. At the same time, through media exposure, he told everyone that renting a house must be vigilant to avoid such a bad thing.