Zhuge Liang is a god-like figure in people's hearts and has been regarded as a god for thousands of years. This is why some people mistakenly think that the reflection on Zhuge Liang is too low and unfair. In addition, the father of Chen Shou, the author of the Three Kingdoms, originally joined the army in Ma Su. Masu was punished because he lost his street pavilion. On this basis, some people think that Chen Shou intended to belittle Zhuge Liang and avenge his father.
In fact, Chen Shou's "History of the Three Kingdoms" has a fair evaluation of Zhuge Liang, and even the song "Lost Street Pavilion" is still full of praise for Zhuge Liang.
In this case, why do some people think that Chen Shou's "History of the Three Kingdoms" has a low evaluation of Zhuge Liang?
For this question, the old man Shan Ye answered this question from three aspects:
First, The Romance of the Three Kingdoms regards Zhuge Liang as a god.
Many people know that Zhuge Liang got information from The Romance of the Three Kingdoms.
Lu Xun evaluated Zhuge Liang in Romance of the Three Kingdoms. How wise is Zhuge Liang, and how close is he to the demon? .
In fact, the Romance of the Three Kingdoms holds Zhuge Liang as a god.
What makes Zhuge Liang most famous is his description of Battle of Red Cliffs.
Battle of Red Cliffs wrote that Kongming offered sacrifices to the east wind, which made readers admire him.
If we look at Zhuge Liang from this height, the history of the Three Kingdoms is certainly impossible!
Second, the model is too hypocritical.
In China society, there are not a few people who read Example. Especially today, when "Example" was selected into the junior high school textbook, more people read "Example" and more people were influenced by it.
It's really touching to read models as literary works!
Reading the model as a history book, or reading it in combination with historical materials, we can see that the model is too hypocritical and misleading.
For the fallacy in the model, the old man Shan Ye had a lot of narratives in Wukong's Q&A before, so I would like to add one more point here.
For example, in Example, there is a saying:? May your majesty entrust me with the effect of bringing the dead back to life. If it doesn't work, I will be punished? . This sentence, combined with history books, shows Zhuge Liang's hypocrisy.
Zhuge Liang's Northern Expeditions again and again never asked Liu Chan, so? Can your majesty entrust me with the effect of recruiting thieves to save life? This is a lie.
Another example? If not, will it cure the minister? Zhuge Liang failed in his Northern Expedition every time. When was Liu Chan punished?
Third, the reflection on Zhuge Liang is fair.
Judging from the contents written in the Three Kingdoms, Chen Shou's evaluation of Zhuge Liang is fair!
Some people think that judging reflection from the perspective of reflection is Wang Er's boasting about selling melons.
Shan Ye, an old man, looked at the History of the Three Kingdoms from another angle, and we can also see that the evaluation of Zhuge Liang in the History of the Three Kingdoms is fair!
Pei Songzhi's Notes on the History of the Three Kingdoms quoted a large number of historical materials and annotated the History of the Three Kingdoms.
Comparing Pei Songzhi's Notes on the History of the Three Kingdoms with Chen Shou's Notes on the History of the Three Kingdoms, we can see that Chen Shou's evaluation of Zhuge Liang is fair, and we can also see that the Romance of the Three Kingdoms admires Zhuge Liang.