Measures:
1, improve the decision-making mechanism according to law.
Improve the system of major administrative decision-making procedures, clarify the decision-making subject, scope of matters, legal procedures and legal responsibilities, standardize decision-making procedures, and strengthen the rigid constraints of legal decision-making procedures.
2. Enhance the effectiveness of public participation.
Major administrative decision-making matters related to the overall economic and social development and the vital interests of the masses should be widely listened to, fully communicated with stakeholders, and pay attention to the opinions of NPC deputies, CPPCC members, people's organizations, grassroots organizations and social organizations. Administrative organs at all levels, especially the municipal and county governments, should strengthen the construction of public participation platforms, disclose and explain information on decision-making matters of high social concern, and give timely feedback on the adoption of opinions and reasons. We will implement a public opinion survey system on major livelihood decision-making issues such as culture and education, medical and health care, resource development, environmental protection and public utilities.
3. Improve the quality of expert argumentation and risk assessment.
Strengthen the construction of a new type of think tank with China characteristics, and establish an expert database of administrative decision-making consultation and demonstration. Experts and professional institutions shall be organized to demonstrate the professional and technical decision-making matters. The selection of argumentation experts should pay attention to professionalism, representativeness and balance, support their independent work, and gradually implement the disclosure of expert information and argumentation opinions. Implement the social stability risk assessment mechanism for major decisions.
4. Strengthen the legality review.
Establish a review mechanism for the legality of major decisions within the administrative organs, and those that have not been reviewed for legality or are illegal after review shall not be submitted for discussion. Establish a team of legal advisers with the staff of government legal institutions as the main body and expert lawyers as participants to ensure that legal advisers play an active role in major administrative decisions and promote administration according to law.
5. Insist on collective discussion and decision.
Major administrative decisions shall be discussed by the executive meeting of the government or the plenary meeting and the meeting of the leading bodies of departments, and the chief executive shall make a decision on the basis of collective discussion. If the decision to be made by the chief executive is inconsistent with the opinions of the majority of the members of the meeting, the reasons shall be explained at the meeting. Collective discussions and decisions should be truthfully recorded and completely archived.
6. Strict decision-making accountability.
The decision-making organ shall follow up the implementation of the decision and the implementation effect, and make a post-evaluation of major administrative decisions according to actual needs. We will improve and strictly implement the lifelong accountability system and accountability mechanism for major decisions, and strictly investigate the party discipline and legal responsibilities of the chief executive, other responsible leaders and relevant responsible personnel for serious mistakes or protracted decisions that cause heavy losses and adverse effects.