A person who has never drunk wine has no right to comment on the ineptitude of wine. A person who uses guesses and estimates to predict the answer can't hand in a passing answer sheet.
Wan Jia has been in this world for two years. In just two years, it has created one myth after another, and it has also suffered hardships again and again. In the past two years, the controversy about it has never stopped. Few media will mention what Wanjia has done for the world. However, assuming that Wanjia goes bankrupt, the discussion is getting hotter and hotter. Even too many people with "China characteristics" are eager for this kind of "excitement". And talked about it excitedly, trying to prove his foresight.
China's economy has been growing through trial and error, and China's capital trend has also been successful through trial and error. Wanjia is also a bold integration and application of new capital. The model of Wanjia coincides with Professor Jesuli Chen's On Consumer Capital, which has caused a heated discussion in China in recent years. Southeast Asia and some western countries have shown great interest in Consumption Capital. "On Consumer Capital" played a game with western economics with a history of 300 years. However, Wanjia waged a fierce struggle against doubts and speculations in China. Who will have the last laugh? I very much hope that the media will not use some one-sided remarks to suppress the market operation of Wanjia and impact consumer demand. Although Wanjia has many shortcomings and some operational loopholes, Wanjia has been filling and plugging the loopholes so far. I also hope that governments at all levels in China can look at the overall situation from a macro perspective. Wanjia's "win-win-win model" can really relieve the pressure of China government and ordinary people in China. This new business model, this new economic change, needs room for development and breathing.
I have also thought deeply about why so many people question Wanjia. In fact, there is no problem with the model of Wanjia and the team of Wanjia. The problem lies with the doubters. In today's China, where moral sense is lacking, everyone is arming themselves with hostility and prevention, because there are too many deceptions and lies in today's society, and even relatives can "betray" for their own selfish interests. Because of this, no one dares to help people who are hit by cars on the roadside. Because of this, no one dares to take the driver's car. Because of this, Chen cursor's transparent charity is increasingly questioned. No one believes that there is anything good around him, and no one wants to believe that there will be good people around him. In such a big environment, wanjia walks slowly, and every step has to bear the pressure from all directions. The voice of questioning and slander is overwhelming like a storm!
Many people, as well as some local functional departments, always like to use words like "if", "if" or "if". Under this imagination, how much social harm and suffering meditation will cause. In fact, this hypothetical idea is not impossible, but it should not be used to deny a new thing and a new economic change. If we can use assumptions to determine whether the development direction of a thing is correct, then I want to say that the first thing that China wants to ban is banks, because banks are an economic system without real physical transactions. On the one hand, they absorb public deposits, on the other hand, they lend others public deposits that do not belong to them. Is this model more risky? Are there more hidden dangers in this model? Some people are under pressure, others are under temptation, and begin to fabricate all kinds of certificates and related materials to defraud bank loans. Most of these loans ended up as dormant accounts and bad debts. Should such an economic system stop for a while? Is it possible to deny the necessity of banking because some people have no public morality? In the insurance industry, many personal insurance types can not enjoy the benefits of safety belts until they are 70 years old or after the death of a natural person. Is there more uncertainty in this business model? More mysterious than wanjia? But can you say that his contribution to society is equal to zero? Or is it because the insurance industry is "imported" and China is copying other people's models, so this mysterious industry is accepted by the public in China because of the title of "imported"? Some people say that Wanjia has no physical transaction, which is a capital game. I would like to ask, what do our ground franchisees sell? What are so many products on the Internet? Is it just because Wanjia didn't send representatives to participate in the bargaining when the franchisees negotiated business, or because Wanjia didn't send representatives to help introduce the products in the store? Although Wanjia did not match the business of first-line buyers and sellers, Wanjia gave the merchants a surprise business tool. It can't be said that Wanjia's business doesn't pay the bill.
So far, it is well documented that how many businesses have resumed their business and how many consumers have completely resumed their consumption more than a year ago. Don't deny the social contribution of the banking insurance industry just because there are people who cheat banks or insurance, and please don't deny Wanjia's contribution to this society too early because there are people who cheat consumers.
No child is born to walk, no model is perfect as soon as it appears, and no change can succeed at the beginning. Please ask the society and the government to give the pioneers of this new consumption model a market space that can break through development. Even more, please ask those one-sided media not to use the rights given to you by society to make extreme remarks in order to achieve their own goals.