The central argument is the soul of the full text and plays a leading role. An argumentative paper generally has only one central argument, and some argumentative papers also put forward several sub-arguments around the center to supplement and prove the central argument. The position of the central argument depends first on the topic, and it is necessary to distinguish between the topic and the argument. Some argumentative papers have a central argument at the beginning, some in the middle and some at the end. Others don't pay much attention to arguments and need readers to summarize themselves.
When reading an argumentative essay, we should first look at whether the topic is a topic or an argument. For example, the topic of "leaving some blanks" is obviously drawn up by rhetorical devices, so the topic of rhetorical devices cannot be used as the central argument.
The general argument adopts the affirmative sentence of "what is so-and-so". The topic of this second mock exam is "Reading is not just a matter of liberal arts", because it uses negative judgment sentences, so it is not an argumentative paper.
When looking for an argument, there are often two kinds of mistakes, that is, confusing the central argument with the sub-argument, and confusing the central argument with the final summary. To distinguish the central argument from the sub-argument, we should grasp that the sub-argument is a supplement to the central argument and not comprehensive. Distinguish between the central argument and the final summary. Pay attention to the summarized sentences and often talk about the significance and function of the argument.
2. To add a proper title to the argumentative paper, we must understand the content of the full text and set the topic in connection with the argument and topic.
So the questions raised can be answered from two aspects. Let's take a look at the topic discussed in this article. You can use the topic as the title. Second, to see what the author holds, that is, what is the central argument, you can use the sentence that reveals the central argument as the title.
3. Summarize the meaning in parts as required, which requires an understanding of the author's writing ideas and argumentation ideas in order to give a good answer.
The examination of the argumentative essay structure in senior high school entrance examination is mainly the division of the full-text structure and the hierarchy of key paragraphs. The division of structural levels should start with the content of the article and see how it puts forward arguments and demonstrates them.
Mainly look at the theme of the article. If the content of the central part is to put forward the argument first, then expound it from several aspects, and finally summarize it in the form of "general theory-sub-theory-general theory", then demonstrate it in the form of "general theory-sub-theory" from several aspects, analyze the problems to be discussed from several aspects, and then draw a comprehensive conclusion that it is "sub-theory-general theory"
Put forward the argument first, then go deeper step by step and explain it layer by layer. At the same time, we should also pay attention to the key words in the article, such as transitional paragraphs, transitional sentences and transitional words, which play a connecting role. If there are words such as "harmony" and "harmony", there are words such as "not only but also", "first" and "second", all of which are hierarchical forms.