From the emperors and courtiers in China to the "authorities" and sesame officials in various fields, they all chose this kind of "guarantee". Because of this "guarantee", what I said is the imperial edict, which cannot be tampered with. With absolute leadership, to unify the thoughts and actions of the whole party and the people of all ethnic groups throughout the country, to flatter courtiers, and to reverse black and white; It is precisely because of this "guarantee" that the concept of "benevolence" has been followed for thousands of years to prevent the people from rebelling; It is precisely because of this "guarantee" that all the premises of quoting the truth classics are available, so that the present paper remains so; It is precisely because of this "guarantee" that there has been a phenomenon of suppressing new thinking, maintaining old traditions and maintaining vested academic status; It is precisely because of this "guarantee" that we have studied the theory of leadership, emphasizing that Secretary XXX's point of view "creatively put forward new major theoretical achievements", but we don't know that the talent of leadership lies in management art, not in academics, not in philosophical theory.
On the premise of "protecting self-existence", China people lost their logic. For guidance, the minimum logic is the innate way of thinking of human beings, unless they are preschool children or fools. Lu Di, a netizen, pointed out this person's absurd thinking method in Five Logical Defects of China People's Thinking, and his conclusion was to make up the logic class. In my opinion, instilling some logical knowledge in teaching can help us grasp the law of thinking more rationally, but the key to solve this problem is to overcome the word "guarantee" in the system.
How did the ambiguous concept of China people come into being? Repeatedly copying what the predecessors said, what the predecessors did not mention, they had to constantly expand its extension on the original concept. China's "Qi" was originally the opposite form of "rice" and three female symbols ("rhyme", or similar to "rhyme"), and it was naturally an invisible and intangible form of power produced by diet. The ancestors also realized that there are similar forces acting on everything in nature, which is metaphysical, so they created another word "shua". However, only "qi" is used instead of "playing" in TCM classics, so later generations say that no matter what kind of qi is used, it confuses the difference between the two and leads to the confusion of concepts.
"Talk without proof" is a manifestation of self-promotion and showing off mystery. Some people who already have a certain social status deliberately try to keep their hands off in order to flaunt their theoretical value and reflect their position. Some people don't understand the meaning of the principle at all, and take the specious principle as his basis. "We support whatever the enemy opposes, and we oppose whatever the enemy supports." It is precisely because we don't understand the principle of opposition that all opposites are formed on the basis of understanding the "similarity" of the object.
The indiscriminate use of analogical reasoning is the performance of argument. I don't know why people should have the spirit of Dagong and under what circumstances. Some people are confused at present, and will not realize some methods to achieve balance from the principle that the lever fulcrum is 0. I don't know some truth from the relationship between positive numbers, negative numbers and 0, so I have to say, "Jianghai can be the king of all valleys, and its goodness can be the king of all valleys." As for the analogy of "air cooling, damp heat and fire dryness", it is an over-emphasis on * * *, and there is no outstanding personality problem. Just like overemphasizing the "theory" of a national leader, it seems that the same thing must be followed, and his thoughts are universally applicable. What does the country rely on to achieve ideological unity? It is natural to rely on scientific principles. For managers, it is a social theoretical problem that needs to be deepened continuously. It is the same thing for the government and the theoretical circle. At the same time, the concept has been reflected in the law, and the actual behavior is important and effective. It is important because it is effective. Abiding by the law is the key to maintaining the consistency between the central and local governments. Excessive emphasis on personal status, in addition to achieving "self-protection", not only has no positive significance, but also imprisons and binds people's thoughts.
Taking "Classics" as an argument is a unique way of thinking formed by the emphasis on centralization in China feudal society. It is a replica form of celebrity effect and authority effect, which has spread to all levels and fields. Even writing a book and your own achievements should be hung in the name of others, which is useless at all. A Huangdi Neijing is actually a dialogue between Qi Bo and Huangdi. It seems that without these people, the theory would not be established, which is ridiculous. Why can't these people protect themselves at once? In fact, it is to borrow someone else's name to promote your own theory in order to achieve wider treatment, or to have your own name. But historians will not record your name in history, because you can't be above emperors and politicians. They want to protect their names in the political field, and historians are just their puppets. Paying attention to celebrity effect is a universal phenomenon in the world and a reflection of social psychology. Why to go to China has become a problem, and the key is formed under the power politics thought of emperors in previous dynasties. All the theories that are beneficial to my rule are correct, and you can't come up with new ideas. I introduced the sage, and the sage's words are the foundation. This bad habit has been passed down to this day.
It is a reflection of violating the laws of nature, absolutizing views, flattering authority and flattering others. A stage has a center of gravity and belongs to the overall adjustment form, just like sleeping at night. In order to find out the theoretical basis of adjustment in different stages, the absolute "sleeping" theory came into being. But today, when the central government pays attention to harmonious thinking, the theoretical circle is once again confused. Isn't it to guide people to have a sense of struggle and competition? How to achieve harmony under the premise of competition? Harmony is the golden mean, deviating from Marxism and seeing Marxism absolutely correctly. Harmonious society has been said for two or three years, but it has not been clarified on the theoretical basis until today. Paying attention to harmony was originally one of the correct political ideas, but some people made it absolute in their actions. Recently, the education department held a national network video conference for primary and secondary school principals, which achieved absolute harmony and no safety accidents. Students going out for internship must go through the examination and approval of the administrative department of education. Schools will naturally let students stay on campus, and teachers don't have to worry, which is harmful to students. One year, a middle school student in Zhejiang committed suicide because of the heavy study burden. The central government immediately formulated a policy to reduce the burden on students, and the examination for primary school students was cancelled. As for whether these ideas are scientific or not, he doesn't care at all. What I emphasize is to keep pace and harmony with the central policy. Is this related to the "self-protection" that conforms to the times?
two
The realistic needs of human beings determine the existence value of the thought of preserving our sanity, but blindly being a "wise" person will not change the feudal concept of centralization and improper administrative style, and China people's thoughts will become rigid and imprisoned. How to solve this problem? This is a philosophical problem with opposite understanding. Just like the opposite understanding of work and rest, people can solve it by adjusting time, although some people can't. Some people can't adjust this relationship well because they can't stand the temptation of interests and interests, which leads to the phenomenon of paying attention to one thing and losing the other. Here we have to say the unity of opposites. Solving this problem will also solve the principle problem of a harmonious society.
The unity of opposites is a methodology that decomposes and assembles opposing understandings, and echoes and connects with each other. Decomposition is a phenomenon of connection between local and local; Set is based on the grasp of relative system. In addition to considering the connection between local and local, there is also a system background, which is the balancer between the two. Analogy is an important method in philosophy, but we should pay attention to their similarity. In order to explain the problem of decomposition and assembly, we might as well take watermelon as an example. Why is there "similarity" between watermelon opening and disassembly and assembly? Because watermelon is rotten, the knife holder should consider it as a whole, which belongs to the form of collection and constitutes the same "reason"
If you give watermelon to two guests, based on the understanding of watermelon phenomenon, it is divided into two, not three, half for you and half for him, and everyone only recognizes his own half (because the other half has no chance with him). But from the systematic analysis, in addition to the apples on both sides, there is also a knife held by the knife holder, which obviously constitutes the trinity understanding, and the knife is in the center. This is obviously based on the understanding of the tool rest and needs to weigh the whole. It is only fair to give half more to those who are thirsty and have high labor intensity. It is also worth noting that there is no room for a knife in watermelon relations. What does this mean? Naturally, both sides will not take advantage of each other, and there is no dispute of interests. Of course, under normal circumstances, people with knives should also eat watermelons. If the knife-wielder and the other person each share a point, we should analyze the knife-wielder with morality. Confucius' doctrine of the mean is understood from this moral level. We should consider ourselves as well as others, as evidenced by the idioms "Put yourself in the other's shoes" and "Don't do to others what you don't want others to do to you". Almost everyone can achieve this "virtue" in some small things in life, but when it comes to their own future and destiny, food, clothing, housing and transportation, and family interests, it is often difficult for people to distinguish the "virtue" of watermelon, no matter what cultivation. Why? Because this is a realistic requirement, the realistic requirement is an objective phenomenon, and the objective phenomenon is divided into two, and there is no trinity. If two people don't eat watermelon on the spot, but make juice, let the knife holder taste it first, and then give it to each other, the situation may be different. Eating two more is the common practice of ordinary people, especially in the case of strong demand for watermelons. In other words, the former "virtue" is produced under the supervision of others, not an instinctive reaction, although there are people with this instinct. If we go further, the other party didn't find the part that the knife holder ate too much because the knife holder lied that the watermelon was small and the seller was short of weight, so the other party would feel fair and have a psychological balance. This obviously uses a clever strategy. If watermelon is not made into juice, it is impossible for people with knives to eat more. Maybe the other person lacks a strong desire for watermelon, and he doesn't care why the knife holder makes watermelon into juice, so he eats it in a muddle and is balanced in his heart. Do they "agree" on watermelon? This "similarity" is manifested in watermelon and also in the demand for watermelon. Without watermelon and the desire to eat watermelon, it is impossible to produce "similarity" in this incident, and this "similarity" constitutes a collective.
From the phenomenon of watermelon separation, we can draw some basic ideas to achieve harmony.
First of all, decomposition is an objective phenomenon. In the objective world, we emphasize the word "fen", recognize each other's interests, ignore each other's personality characteristics, and don't mix them with other people's characteristics, so we can go deep into the existence of opposing views in natural science. This seems to have nothing to do with harmony, but if we regard objective understanding of each other's views as a kind of rationality, do not impose our own views on others, and do not regard policies as a stumbling block to personality development, this rationality itself is the ideological basis of harmony. The essence of rationality is to think about problems based on this "whole" (collective) and put yourself in the same position on the basis of the same goal or starting point.
Secondly, whether it is society or scientific research, it is always inseparable from the corresponding collective form (watermelon is a collective composed of three people). Different management levels, that is, different collectives and joint ventures, also constitute a collective form. To make the collective develop continuously, we must pay attention to each other's harmony, which is determined by the same purpose. Modern enterprises pay attention to team spirit, which is actually a harmonious atmosphere built around the same goal. The exchange of products also forms a special collective form. To form a positive influence in society and establish a good image, we must stress credibility and achieve harmony with society and consumers. On the surface, it belongs to the category of ethics, but in fact it belongs to the marketing means of seeking status and long-term interests.
Third, we must have nothing to do with ourselves in material interests, and we must act as a zero representing the overall interests in order to do a good job of overall balance. Once involved, fairness will be ruined, and there will be a phenomenon of being both a referee and an athlete.
Fourth, fairness is relative, and absolute fairness is unfair. Watermelons don't have to get the same amount, but pay attention to the proportion of learning.
Fifth, coordination needs fairness, and fairness needs supervision. Without supervision and mutual restraint, there is no fairness. Especially today, when the gap between the rich and the poor is large and the basic welfare cannot be guaranteed, increasing policy transparency and strengthening supervision are important measures to establish a good image of the government and achieve social harmony.
Sixth, fairness needs to be realized by giving consideration to intelligence, which can be called intelligent fairness. Intelligent fairness includes two aspects. One is to use strategies to quell public dissatisfaction and let the public feel fair. One is to enable or retain smart talents. The use of talents is organized and stipulated, but once talents are found, they will have the psychology of loving talents. If it goes beyond the level and violates the organization regulations, we will adopt the method of curve adjustment, first adjust the position of A to half level, then to B, and then to half level. This gives the public a sense of justice and legality, although the organization department knows it. If such special provisions are formulated in the system, it will inevitably turn ordinary into special. In today's increasingly fierce competition for talents, blindly stressing fairness and excessively following the system may lead to the loss of some talents. As a collective, talents are the most precious. Because someone violates the system, he will be upset if you deduct his money in public, but you have to deal with the public to make everyone feel that you are fair, so as to achieve group coordination. Usually, the loss in the embankment is compensated outside the embankment, which means this.
Seventh, fairness is a psychological balance, not a substantial average or equality. If every citizen can get corresponding ideological satisfaction, social harmony will actually be realized.
Eighth, harmony should be based on coordination, coordination should be guaranteed by system and wisdom, and system should be based on opposing thinking. In coordination, we should pay attention to people's own (excluding their own) realistic requirements, and then make a rational balance.
Through the analysis of "unity of opposites", we can see that to coordinate the overall interests, we must abandon self-interest and take the "one" of the overall interests as the starting point, which is "0" for ourselves. Once egoism is incorporated, there will be a phenomenon of preserving our health. This is related to system construction. We must admit that many aspects of the system are not straightened out, which directly affects the perfection of the system, intensifies contradictions to a great extent, affects coordination and hinders harmony. Therefore, the establishment of scientific political system and economic system is an important condition to achieve harmony, which requires theory first, making a fuss from opposing thinking, speculating from the "form" of the nature of * * *, and deepening philosophical understanding. China's system will not be advanced, innovative, harmonious, and correct logical errors if it pays attention to centralized governance, authoritative effect, lack of containment, and strong supervision.